2005
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-62252005000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetical analyses in three fish species of the genus Pimelodus(Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from rio São Francisco: considerations about the karyotypical evolution in the genus

Abstract: Karyotypes and other chromosomal markers were investigated in three species of the catfish genus Pimelodus, namely P. fur, P. maculatus and Pimelodus sp., from municipality of Três Marias, Minas Gerais, Brazil, using differential staining techniques (C-banding, Silver nitrate and CMA3 staining). The diploid chromosome number was 2n = 56 in P. maculatus and Pimelodus sp., while in P. fur 2n = 54. The karyotype of P. fur consisted in 32M + 8SM + 6ST + 8A with fundamental number (NF) of 100, that of P. maculatus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
26
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
26
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1c). C-banding for most of the family Pimelodidae is similar to that seen in M. platanum with some heterochromatic regions in the terminal position, as for example, in species of the genus Pimelodus (Souza et al, 2004;Garcia & Moreira-Filho, 2005;Treco et al, 2008), Steindachneridion Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1919(Swarça et al, 2005 and others. In several species and/or populations of the genus Pimelodus, chromosomal marker pairs, with interstitial heterochromatin, could also be seen (Borin & Martins-Santos, 2004;Treco et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1c). C-banding for most of the family Pimelodidae is similar to that seen in M. platanum with some heterochromatic regions in the terminal position, as for example, in species of the genus Pimelodus (Souza et al, 2004;Garcia & Moreira-Filho, 2005;Treco et al, 2008), Steindachneridion Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1919(Swarça et al, 2005 and others. In several species and/or populations of the genus Pimelodus, chromosomal marker pairs, with interstitial heterochromatin, could also be seen (Borin & Martins-Santos, 2004;Treco et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…1a). In a review on the cytogenetic studies of 27 species of the family Pimelodidae by Swarça et al (2007), 23 had a diploid number of 56 chromosomes, three had 2n = 50 chromosomes: Pinirampus pirinampu (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Swarça et al, 1999;Vasconcelos & Martins-Santos, 2000), Luciopimelodus pati (Valenciennes, 1835) (Sánchez, 2006), and Calophysus macropterus (Liechtenstein, 1819) (Ramirez-Gil et al, 1998), and one had 2n = 54 chromosomes: Pimelodus fur (Lütken, 1874) (Garcia & Moreira-Filho, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, according to Diniz et al (2009), the location of 5S and 18S rDNA sites on different chromosomes and different positions would be a way to restrict the setting of unfavorable rearrangements, for example, translocation of segments between these genes. Under the phylogenetics systematics light, this characterization may place the status of this character as an apomorphy, which is yet to be proven regarding other species from the genus, for example, Pimelodus fur has not exhibited this synteny (Garcia et al, 2005). Moreover, the character robustness must also be tested in relation to the same species in other populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several genetic studies of partial mitochondrial and nuclear regions of P. maculatus have found a high degree of genetic diversity among populations (Garcia & Moreira Filho 2005;Paiva & Kalapothakis 2008;Carvalho et al 2011;Lundberg et al 2011;Pereira et al 2011;Ribolli et al 2012;Ferreira et al 2014;Frantine-Silva et al 2015). Here, we provide the first description of the complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence for P. maculatus, which could support the development of molecular markers studies to aid wildlife forensics, evolutionary approaches, and conservation and management studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%