2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-91992011000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Abstract:To evaluate scallop safety in the Guangzhou seafood market, contents of shellfish toxins in adductor muscle, mantle skirts, gills and visceral mass of scallops were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and mouse unit assay. The results showed that: paralytic shellfish poisoning contents were up to 37.44 mg/100 g by ELISA and 319.99 MU/100 g by mouse unit assay, which did not exceed the limits of national standards (80 mg/100g and 400 MU/100 g); the contents of diarrhetic shellfish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, commercially available ELISA kits have been successfully tested for the determination and quantification of antimicrobials (e.g., crystal violet, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin, malachite green, metabolites of furaltadone and furazolidone) in fish from aquaculture, to assess illegal use of the compounds (Jester et al, 2014 ; Conti et al, 2015 ). These kits have also proved effective in the detection of toxins [e.g., paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), diarrhetic shellfish poisoning, neurotoxic shellfish poisoning, and amnesic shellfish] in shellfish and seafood (Garet et al, 2010 ; Huazhang et al, 2011 ; Eberhart et al, 2013 ; Turner and Goya, 2016 ) and pesticides in fish (Sapozhnikova et al, 2015 ). Still, when ELISA method was compared to a phosphatase 2A inhibition assay, the latter displayed more promising results as a screening tool for diarrhetic shellfish toxins, given the sensitivity and low level of false results (Eberhart et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Analytical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, commercially available ELISA kits have been successfully tested for the determination and quantification of antimicrobials (e.g., crystal violet, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin, malachite green, metabolites of furaltadone and furazolidone) in fish from aquaculture, to assess illegal use of the compounds (Jester et al, 2014 ; Conti et al, 2015 ). These kits have also proved effective in the detection of toxins [e.g., paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), diarrhetic shellfish poisoning, neurotoxic shellfish poisoning, and amnesic shellfish] in shellfish and seafood (Garet et al, 2010 ; Huazhang et al, 2011 ; Eberhart et al, 2013 ; Turner and Goya, 2016 ) and pesticides in fish (Sapozhnikova et al, 2015 ). Still, when ELISA method was compared to a phosphatase 2A inhibition assay, the latter displayed more promising results as a screening tool for diarrhetic shellfish toxins, given the sensitivity and low level of false results (Eberhart et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Analytical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%