2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-91992010000400017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of infection by Brucella spp. in free-ranging and captive wild animals from São Paulo State, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding leptospirosis, our results contradict these thoughts. Likewise, in preliminary studies, we found low prevalence of toxoplasmosis (Fornazari et al, 2011), leishmaniasis (Paiz et al, 2015) and brucellosis (Antunes et al, 2010). Thus, contrary to our initial thoughts, so far there is no evidence that opossums are important carriers of zoonoses in Botucatu.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding leptospirosis, our results contradict these thoughts. Likewise, in preliminary studies, we found low prevalence of toxoplasmosis (Fornazari et al, 2011), leishmaniasis (Paiz et al, 2015) and brucellosis (Antunes et al, 2010). Thus, contrary to our initial thoughts, so far there is no evidence that opossums are important carriers of zoonoses in Botucatu.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding Brucella spp., the animal tested in this case reported a negative result to B. canis antibodies (Table 4), which is the standard screening test. This pathogen is constantly surveilled for in the species, although only two studies reported the presence of antibodies in serum, and none remained positive in the confirmatory tests (Antunes et al., 2010; Deem & Emmons, 2005; Deem et al., 2012; Kida, 2013). Although the maned wolves could be exposed to the pathogen through direct or indirect contact with domestic or feral dogs, there are no reports of the pathogen being detected in the species, and false positive serologic test results are suspected as cross‐reactions with other gram‐negative bacteria are a major issue (Antunes et al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the previous studies of Brucella spp. infection were performed: Both RBPT for screening and serum TAT for confirmation that are utilized in serological surveys in various wild animals [ 20 , 31 ]. The TAT is one of the conventional serological tests based on the agglutination reaction that occurs slowly, referred to as slow agglutination test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of agglutination tests was employed for the diagnosis of many diseases in Asian elephants [ 17 - 19 ] and other wildlife [ 20 ]. In the present study, the cell suspensions of B. abortus antigen for RBPT and EDTA-TAT, the positive and negative reference controls, were provided by the National Institute of Animal Health, Thailand, and performed following the procedure described by OIE [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%