2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572003000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diametral tensile strength and water sorption of glass-ionomer cements used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Abstract: he purposes of this study were to evaluate the diametral tensile strength and the water sorption of restorative (Fuji IX and Ketac Molar) and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (ProTec Cem, Fuji Plus and Vitremer) mixed at both manufacturer and increased powder: liquid ratio, for their use in the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. A conventional restorative glass-ionomer (Ketac Fil) was used as control. Specimens (6.0 mm in diameter x 3.0 mm in height) were prepared and stored (1 hour, 1 day and 1 week… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
16
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the water-sorption of EBPM+3DMAHDM+4.5MPC was 47 µg/mm 3 , which exceeded the ISO requirement of  40 µg/mm 3 [37]. While a commercial resin-modified glass ionomer (with uses including Class V restorations) had a water-sorption of 140 µg/mm 3 [47], to follow the ISO suggestion the EBPM+3DMAHDM+4.5MPC was excluded from biofilm experiments in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Indeed, the water-sorption of EBPM+3DMAHDM+4.5MPC was 47 µg/mm 3 , which exceeded the ISO requirement of  40 µg/mm 3 [37]. While a commercial resin-modified glass ionomer (with uses including Class V restorations) had a water-sorption of 140 µg/mm 3 [47], to follow the ISO suggestion the EBPM+3DMAHDM+4.5MPC was excluded from biofilm experiments in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, a restorative resin-modified GIC indicated for anterior teeth, Fuji VIII (GC), is now available on market. Such material was chosen because it have presented higher diametral tensile and bond strengths than Ketac Molar (ESPE) 1,20 . On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the materials performance in the present short-term clinical trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the immense water uptake causes swelling of the restoration, which exerts unwanted expansion forces to cavity walls 32) . In this regard, the BG-series may be expected to show better results in a clinical setting due to its more acceptable water sorption, which was in the range of commercial glass-ionomer cements (50-250 µg/ mm 3 ) 33,34) .…”
Section: Water Sorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%