2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-04202006000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee physiology and production: a review

Abstract: Overall, drought and unfavourable temperatures are the major climatic limitations for coffee production. These limitations are expected to become increasingly important in several coffee growing regions due to the recognized changes in global climate, and also because coffee cultivation has spread towards marginal lands, where water shortage and unfavourable temperatures constitute major constraints to coffee yield. In this review, we examine the impacts of such limitations on the physiology, and consequently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
380
2
34

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(437 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(271 reference statements)
21
380
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences in crop yield are rather unlikely to result from differences in photosynthetic performance as evaluated in single leaves (see Figure 3). In general, however, compared to arabica, conilon seems to be less responsive to atmospheric evaporative demand -with better response to irrigation (DaMatta and Ramalho, 2006) and, in addition, its more open architecture might result in higher light transmittance through the canopy. Taken together, these traits would favour maintenance of gas exchange capacity for longer periods, and overall total carbon assimilation would be greater in conilon than in arabica, which would, perhaps, partly explain the superior performance of the high-yielding progenies of conilon as compared with their arabica counterparts.…”
Section: Physiological Components Of Crop Yieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These differences in crop yield are rather unlikely to result from differences in photosynthetic performance as evaluated in single leaves (see Figure 3). In general, however, compared to arabica, conilon seems to be less responsive to atmospheric evaporative demand -with better response to irrigation (DaMatta and Ramalho, 2006) and, in addition, its more open architecture might result in higher light transmittance through the canopy. Taken together, these traits would favour maintenance of gas exchange capacity for longer periods, and overall total carbon assimilation would be greater in conilon than in arabica, which would, perhaps, partly explain the superior performance of the high-yielding progenies of conilon as compared with their arabica counterparts.…”
Section: Physiological Components Of Crop Yieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Relatively high temperature during blossoming, especially if associated with a prolonged dry season, may cause abortion of flowers (Camargo, 1985). It should be noted, however, that selected cultivars under intensive management conditions have allowed arabica coffee plantations to be spread to marginal regions with average temperatures as high as 24-25ºC, with satisfactory yields, as in northeastern Brazil (DaMatta and Ramalho, 2006). On the other hand, in regions with a mean annual temperature below 17-18ºC, growth is largely depressed.…”
Section: Climatic Factors and Environ-mental Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such mechanisms and traits included stress avoidance behavior as observed in coffee, and other woody species, via stomatal control of water loss during a dry period coupled with high atmospheric vapor-pressure deficits, and deep-rooting (Hernández et al, 1989;DaMatta and Ramalho, 2006); differential timing between female-ear silking and male-tassel pollen grain shedding in maize (Bolaños and Edmeads, 1993a,b;Bolaños et. al, 1993); and some osmotic adjustment and morphological and anatomical changes that affects leaf water loss such as cuticle waxing, leaf hairs and rolling, and root hydraulicresistance such as observed in cereals (Richards and Passioura, 1981a,b;Morgan, 1984;Passioura, 1988;Blum et al, 1989;Blum and Pnuel, 1990;Blum, 1993).…”
Section: Photosynthesis and Its Relation To Crop Productivity: Some Ementioning
confidence: 99%