2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1676-06032011000500020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: O presente estudo foi realizado para obter conhecimento do número de espécies de Rotifera que ocorre nos corpos de água do Estado de São Paulo. Das 22 Unidades de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos do Estado de São Paulo onde foram amostrados 250 corpos de água totalizando 390 amostras no Projeto BIOTA/FAPESP, foram exploradas 5 UGRHI (Mantiqueira, Pardo,Tietê/Jacaré, Mogi Guaçu, Alto Tietê),onde foram registradas 277 espécies, das quais 89 são espécies que nunca haviam sido registradas no Estado de São Paulo.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same pattern was also observed in several studies performed in the floodplain lakes of Pantanal, Araguaia, Amazon and Paraná, and also in São Paulo state (Lansac-Tôha et al, 2008;Lima, Loverde-Oliveira, Silva, & Oliveira, 2012;Arrieira et al, 2016b). The results observed for species richness were superior to that of other microbial taxa traditionally studied in this lake, such as the rotifer community (14 taxa) (Soares, Tundisi, & Matsumura-Tundisi, 2011), cladocerans and copepods, showing low representativeness with only three and one taxa, respectively (Meschiatti & Arcifa, 2002). Similar results were observed in a study performed in Bonita Lake (SP), in which testate amoebae species richness was higher than that observed for other planktonic groups (Alarcão et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The same pattern was also observed in several studies performed in the floodplain lakes of Pantanal, Araguaia, Amazon and Paraná, and also in São Paulo state (Lansac-Tôha et al, 2008;Lima, Loverde-Oliveira, Silva, & Oliveira, 2012;Arrieira et al, 2016b). The results observed for species richness were superior to that of other microbial taxa traditionally studied in this lake, such as the rotifer community (14 taxa) (Soares, Tundisi, & Matsumura-Tundisi, 2011), cladocerans and copepods, showing low representativeness with only three and one taxa, respectively (Meschiatti & Arcifa, 2002). Similar results were observed in a study performed in Bonita Lake (SP), in which testate amoebae species richness was higher than that observed for other planktonic groups (Alarcão et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The checklist presented by the Project BIOTA/FAPESP in São Paulo state reported 277 Rotifera species from 90 water bodies, 12 Copepoda Calanoida species from 250 water bodies, 39 species of Copepoda Cyclopoida from 207 water bodies and 96 Cladocera species from 300 water bodies (Matsumura- , Rocha et al 2011, Soares et al 2011). In the upper Paraná River flood plain 541 species were reported from 36 aquatic environments from 2000 to 2007(Lansac-Tôha,et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotifer Polyarthra remata was previously reported in other rivers of the Paraná basin [47] and Synchaeta sp. in Tietê headwaters [48] and upstream reservoirs (Nova Avanhandava and Promissão; [47]. Both endemic microcrustacean Daphnia laevis [49] and Mesocyclops sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The olygochaeta Chaetogaster diastrophus, was registered in upstream reservoirs [45,46]. The rotifer Polyarthra remata was previously reported in other rivers of the Paraná basin [47] and Synchaeta sp. in Tietê headwaters [48] and upstream reservoirs (Nova Avanhandava and Promissão; [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%