2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1676-06032011000500007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: São Paulo harbors 231 mammal species until now. This is an estimate of its real diversity since many regions of the State continue poorly surveyed, and also reflects the lack of taxonomic work for certain mammal taxa. Nevertheless, our knowledge of the São Paulo mammals has increased in 20% in the last 12 years, especially in relation to bats and rodents. These new data are based in mammal inventories and also in the analysis of specimens housed in scientific collections associated with taxonomic revisions. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
39
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This record is unexpected for São Paulo, since no recent mammal checklist of the state reports W. oenax (e.g., Vivo, 1998;Bressan et al, 2009;Vivo et al, 2011) even though the specimen MZUSP 6281 was collected 71 years ago. Yet, the known distribution of this species has been reported to be more restricted than formely thought as a consequence of taxonomic advances since its description, as explained next.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This record is unexpected for São Paulo, since no recent mammal checklist of the state reports W. oenax (e.g., Vivo, 1998;Bressan et al, 2009;Vivo et al, 2011) even though the specimen MZUSP 6281 was collected 71 years ago. Yet, the known distribution of this species has been reported to be more restricted than formely thought as a consequence of taxonomic advances since its description, as explained next.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a consequence of the progresses on the taxonomy of morphologically similar genera (Juliomys, Wiedomys and Wilfredomys), which led to a reappraisal of their distribution ranges, and to no literature assignments of W. oenax specimens to São Paulo state localities, probably misled Vivo (1998) and Vivo et al (2011) to not include this species in their checklists. Therefore, the northernmost published record of W. oenax from which a locality can be retrieved were the one from Curitiba (MN 8269) reported by Ávila-Pires (1960).…”
Section: Which I Freely Translate From Portuguese: "Wilfredomys Oenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jataí ; Guarulhos, rural area de Vivo & Gregorin, 2001); Pariquera-Açu (DZSJRP 15844); Perequê (?) (Andersen, 1906, type locality of Phyllophora megalotis Gray, 1842); Piquete (MZUSP 1228); Primeiro Morro, Rio Ipiranga (MZUSP 16189); Ribeira, Abismo do Porco (MZUSP 12019); São Paulo, P.E.…”
Section: Microncyteris Megalotis (Gray 1842) (Fig 12)unclassified