2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-99402015000400008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silagem de resíduo da extração de amido da mandioca em substituição ao milho moído da ração para ovinos

Abstract: RESUMO Com objetivo de avaliar o efeito da substituição do milho grão moído pela silagem de resíduo da extração de amido da mandioca, em dietas para ovinos em confinamento, foi mensurado o consumo, a digestibilidade da matéria seca (MS) e dos nutrientes, e o pH ruminal. Foram utilizados cinco ovinos, canulados, distribuídos em delineamento de quadrado latino (5x5), composto de cinco animais, cinco dietas e cinco períodos experimentais de 21 dias cada, em um total de 105 dias de experimento. Os tratamentos fora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference (P = 0.19) in the total carbohydrates (TC) of silage from the different treatments, whose average grades are close to most of the values reported by Rabelo et al (2014), Tres et al (2014), Gonçalves et al (2015), and Moro et al (2015), whereas in corn silage, the proportions of mineral matter, CP, and ether extract are relatively constant. There was also no difference (P = 0.30) in the non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) of the treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…There was no difference (P = 0.19) in the total carbohydrates (TC) of silage from the different treatments, whose average grades are close to most of the values reported by Rabelo et al (2014), Tres et al (2014), Gonçalves et al (2015), and Moro et al (2015), whereas in corn silage, the proportions of mineral matter, CP, and ether extract are relatively constant. There was also no difference (P = 0.30) in the non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) of the treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%