2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842012000200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The choice of bromeliads as a microhabitat by Scinax argyreornatus (Anura, Hylidae)

Abstract: The association of anurans to bromeliads presents different degrees of interaction such as: eventual, obligatory and bromeligen. The frog species Scinax argyreornatus shows a regular association with these plants. The goal of this study is to characterise the degree of association between the frog S. argyreornatus to different species of bromeliads. We identified which species of bromeliad is regularly associated with S. argyreornatus and recognised which factors interfere with this association preference. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Poelman et al 2013. Specifically, presence of a bromeligenous hylid species of the genus Scinax in the AF was greater in larger bromeliads (Oliveira & Navas 2004, Pederassi et al 2012. Similarly, our study also showed that selection was not random.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Poelman et al 2013. Specifically, presence of a bromeligenous hylid species of the genus Scinax in the AF was greater in larger bromeliads (Oliveira & Navas 2004, Pederassi et al 2012. Similarly, our study also showed that selection was not random.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Peixoto (1995) functionally split anurans that use bromeliads into bromelicolous, when using bromeliads sporadically as shelter, and bromeligenous/bromeligens, when they complete their entire life cycle within bromeliads (e.g. Lehtinen 2004, Pederassi et al 2012, Sabagh et al 2012. Critically, their ability to hold water makes them excellent (sometimes unique) refuges during adverse drier environmental conditions when microhabitats are less hospitable for both fungi (Holmes et al 2014) and amphibians (Kitching 2000, Lehtinen 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same study site, Phyllodytes luteolus selected small plants with more leaves (Mageski et al, 2016). In addition, another study have showed that the structure of the plants (0) influences bromeliad selection by Ololygon argyreornata (Pederassi et al, 2012). The structure of bromeliads are related to the capability to accumulate rainwater (Pontes et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In natural ecosystems, epiphytes provide important services such as water accumulation, nutrient cycling and refuge (Barbosa et al, 2015;Céréghino et al, 2019;Seidl et al, 2019), attracting seed dispersers, as well as favoring the dispersion of plant propagules (Meiado, 2008). In addition, they help maintain biological diversity and interactive balance by providing resources and conditions (food, shelter and micro-habitat) for many other organisms, such as micro-organisms, insects, amphibians and reptiles (Pederassi et al, 2012;Brandt et al, 2017). Some epiphyte species such as Tillandsia usneoides (L.) L. and Canistropsis billbergioides (Schult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%