2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842002000100017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Butterflies from the Uberlândia region, Central Brazil: species list and biological comments

Abstract: A total of 251 butterfly species were recorded in Uberlândia region, with collecting concentrated mainly in forest areas. Aspects of geographic distribution of some Ithomiinae, as well as interactions of both adults and immatures with plants, and reproduction periods for the more abundant species are discussed. Collections in open, riverside, and wetland areas, as well as the use of bait, should substantially increase the number of species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
14
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern was also reported in other relatively complete inventories in the Neotropics, showing Hesperiidae as the best represented butterfly group in any well surveyed locality, followed by the Nymphalidae (Brown & Freitas 2000b). However, in short term studies with low sampling effort there has been a clear numerical dominance of Nymphalidae (Motta 2002;Iserhard & Romanowski 2004;Duarte & Almeida 2006;Marchiori & Romanowski 2006), likely due to the fact that they are easily captured and identified in the field. The Hesperiidae, Lycaenidae and Riodinidae, all including many small and inconspicuous species, require more effort to be adequately sampled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern was also reported in other relatively complete inventories in the Neotropics, showing Hesperiidae as the best represented butterfly group in any well surveyed locality, followed by the Nymphalidae (Brown & Freitas 2000b). However, in short term studies with low sampling effort there has been a clear numerical dominance of Nymphalidae (Motta 2002;Iserhard & Romanowski 2004;Duarte & Almeida 2006;Marchiori & Romanowski 2006), likely due to the fact that they are easily captured and identified in the field. The Hesperiidae, Lycaenidae and Riodinidae, all including many small and inconspicuous species, require more effort to be adequately sampled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…continuing studies and long-range conservation strategies) even if no threatened species have been recorded in the present study. The entire area shows a unique combination of different habitats and geography that includes deep valleys, expansive mangroves, high mountains and lowland plains, which provide conditions for the presence of a rich and diverse fauna combining elements from Mielke (1996); 17 Brown & Freitas (2002b); 18 Mielke & Casagrande (1998) Mielke et al (2008); 23 Motta (2002); 24 Duarte et al (2010); 25 Monteiro et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of butterflies, species lists may provide relevant information about diversity, distribution and ecology (Motta 2002, and such information can serve as the basis for ecological zoning and conservation action plans. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listas regionais de espécies do grupo são importantes por prover informações sobre diversidade taxonômica, genética e ecológica (Motta 2002): também, através da comparação da ocorrência de espécies em diferentes habitats ou localidades podem ser definidas as formas de manejo mais adequadas (Balmer 2002). Assim, tais listas constituem material fundamental para avaliação e monitoramento ambiental e podem servir para determinar áreas prioritárias para conservação (De Vries et al 1997, Harding et al 1995, Viejo et al 1989.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified