2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822009000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and molecular characterization of Bacillus pumilus isolated from coastal environment in Cochin, India

Abstract: Bacillus species constitute a diverse group of bacteria widely distributed in soil and the aquatic environment. In this study, Bacillus strains isolated from the coastal environment of Cochin, India were identified by detailed conventional biochemical methods, fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis and partial 16S rDNA sequencing. Analysis of the data revealed that Bacillus pumilus was the most predominant species in the region under study followed by B. cereus and B. sphaericus. The B. pumilus isolates were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the genera and species recovered in this study were from marsh sediments and have previously been described in saline environments except B. safensis, Bacillus thioparans and B. simplex (Ventosa et al, 1998;Okamoto et al, 2001;Yoon et al, 2001;2003;Chookietwattana, 2003;Sánchez-Porro et al, 2003;Borsodi et al, 2005;Fan et al, 2006;Pérez-Ibarra et al, 2007;Ventosa et al, 2008;Parvathi et al, 2009;Sasaki et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2010;Bassey and Grigson, 2011). This finding extends our knowledge of the bacterial diversity in saline environments and indicates that the groups obtained, including potential new species, are well adapted.…”
Section: Distribution Of Halophilic Bacteria In Different Sediments Esupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The majority of the genera and species recovered in this study were from marsh sediments and have previously been described in saline environments except B. safensis, Bacillus thioparans and B. simplex (Ventosa et al, 1998;Okamoto et al, 2001;Yoon et al, 2001;2003;Chookietwattana, 2003;Sánchez-Porro et al, 2003;Borsodi et al, 2005;Fan et al, 2006;Pérez-Ibarra et al, 2007;Ventosa et al, 2008;Parvathi et al, 2009;Sasaki et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2010;Bassey and Grigson, 2011). This finding extends our knowledge of the bacterial diversity in saline environments and indicates that the groups obtained, including potential new species, are well adapted.…”
Section: Distribution Of Halophilic Bacteria In Different Sediments Esupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Later on, in consequence of the analyses performed by utilizing the API 50CHB test system, this isolate was identified to be the Bacillus pumilus (data not shown). These results obtained were determined to comply with the literature data (Bottone and Peluso 2003;Parvathi et al 2009;Liu et al 2013). …”
Section: Isolation Of Test Strainsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Therefore, B. pumilus was not the most widespread bacterial group among our terrestrial B. pumilus group isolates collection, in contrast to general conception that considered this species as the pre-dominant one (Newcombe et al, 2005;Parvathi et al, 2009). A more close relation with B. altitudinis (gyrB 3 ) (genetic distance of 0.086) and B. invictae (gyrB 3 ) (genetic distance of 0.074) than with B. xiamenensis HYC-10 T (genetic distance of 0.107) was observed.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 57%