2001
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822001000300016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoclonal Antibodies to Identify Tomato Mosaic Tobamovirus (Tomv)

Abstract: Monoclonal antibodies were obtained against Tomato mosaic tobamovirus (ToMV) isolated in Brazil. One antibody (8G7G2) isotyped as IgG2b (κ light chain) showed strong specificity and very low cross reaction with the Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). It can be used in identification of tomato mosaic virus (ToMV).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monoclonal antibodies for ToMV detection are being developed with the aim to eliminate cross-reactivity with other tobamoviruses invading tomatoes [39]. However, even these may not always be able to completely eliminate cross-reactivity with other Tobamoviruses, e.g., with Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monoclonal antibodies for ToMV detection are being developed with the aim to eliminate cross-reactivity with other tobamoviruses invading tomatoes [39]. However, even these may not always be able to completely eliminate cross-reactivity with other Tobamoviruses, e.g., with Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the protocol was optimised in the past, the improvement of the serological detection method with monoclonal antibodies was not considered. Duarte, Gomes, Gesztesi, Lopes, and Tavares (2001) who obtained monoclonal antibodies against ToMV reported the low efficiency of such antibody production where only four possible monoclonal antibodies could be produced in low concentrations. Our developed RT real-time PCR was shown to be five orders of magnitude more sensitive than the serological method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%