2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132012000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Lsr2 gene of Mycobacterium leprae in nasal mucus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ). Despite the lower PCR positivity in EG, levels reported are higher than published previously ( de Almeida et al 2004 , Nagao-Dias et al 2007 , Banerjee et al 2010 , Custodio et al 2012 ). Moreover, studies indicate that contacts of leprosy cases that are nasal PCR positive have a higher risk of developing the disease ( Douglas et al 2004 , Bakker et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 ). Despite the lower PCR positivity in EG, levels reported are higher than published previously ( de Almeida et al 2004 , Nagao-Dias et al 2007 , Banerjee et al 2010 , Custodio et al 2012 ). Moreover, studies indicate that contacts of leprosy cases that are nasal PCR positive have a higher risk of developing the disease ( Douglas et al 2004 , Bakker et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Detection of the bacilli may be demonstrated in studies among contacts showing rates of positivity ranging from 1.7-23% ( de Almeida et al 2004 , Nagao-Dias et al. 2007 , Banerjee et al 2010 , Custodio et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for detecting a very small number of genomic templates in a clinical sample. Several specific genomic regions have been targeted such as 16S rRNA (7) rpoT and sodA (18,19) 36-kDa antigen (20), Complex 85 (21) and the repetitive sequences (LEPRPT, LEPREP, REPLEP and RLEP) ( 22) among other M. leprae genes (23)(24)(25) of which the most sensitive and specific sequence was found to be RLEP region (26). Other repeated loci can also be targeted that are present in fewer copies.…”
Section: Diagnostic Tests Based On Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (...mentioning
confidence: 99%