2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132012000100019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This work investigated the effects of co-occurring aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ) and microcystin (MC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent epidemiological study it was shown that aflatoxin interacts with HBV and induces hepatocellular carcinoma in high exposure areas [61]. In addition, through interaction of MC and aflatoxin B 1 synergic mutagenic response was observed [62,63]. Therefore, combination of various risk factors, particularly HBV, aflatoxin, and MCs, may also be responsible for the endemicity of PLC [64].…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Sydney] At 16:38 19 September 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent epidemiological study it was shown that aflatoxin interacts with HBV and induces hepatocellular carcinoma in high exposure areas [61]. In addition, through interaction of MC and aflatoxin B 1 synergic mutagenic response was observed [62,63]. Therefore, combination of various risk factors, particularly HBV, aflatoxin, and MCs, may also be responsible for the endemicity of PLC [64].…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Sydney] At 16:38 19 September 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enzyme-based biosensors are disadvantageous when compared with the aptatoxisensor, as the recognition enzyme at the center of the biosensor activity usually becomes inhibited by contaminants present in the water sample and so returns in faulty results. In addition, these biosensors are not usually efficient at discriminating between the various cyanotoxin analogs (e.g., nodularins and MC-LR) present in the same sample [44,45,46,47]. The novel aptatoxisensor presented in this study does not suffer from such limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aflatoxin B 1 was detected in the mean level of 1.1 μ g·kg −1 , 7.4 μ g·kg −1 , and 3.8 μ g·kg −1 in maize bran, other cereal products, and finished fish feed, respectively. Another fish feed survey conducted in Brazil by Hashimoto et al [71] detected aflatoxin at maximum contamination levels of 15.6 μ g·kg −1 . In addition, a survey on commercial shrimp feeds conducted in the Philippines found AFB 1 contamination levels up to 120 μ g·kg −1 [69].…”
Section: Mycotoxin Contamination In Fish Feed and Feed Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 99%