2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132002000600013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic of decapod crustacean larvae on the entrance of Guanabara bay

Abstract: In the present study, we observed seasonal variations in the density of decapod larvae as well as changes in density related to diurnal and tidal cycles. Among the decapod larvae collected, portunids and grapsids were the most abundant, especially during nocturnal ebb tides and near the surface. The same results were obtained in late winter (September) and late summer (March). These results demonstrated a flow of decapod larvae from Guanabara Bay to adjacent coastal waters. Luciferid (Lucifer faxoni) was the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
1
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
16
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher larval densities recorded during night sampling at Guanabara Bay and in other studies (Bridger, 1956;Phonlor, 1973;Castro and Bonecker, 1996;Hettler et al, 1997) could be related to net avoidance by larger larvae during the day (Matsuura, 1977) and to vertical migration so that the larvae assembled near the bottom during the day and dispersed through the water column at night (Bridger, 1956;Bonecker et al, 2002). Other meroplanktonic organisms such as decapod larvae have a similar diurnal pattern in Guanabara Bay (Fernandes et al, 2002). Although tide cycle did not influence significantly larval densities in the present study, higher values during ebb and early flood tide at night sampling, could be an indication that fish larvae be exported from the bay at this period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…The higher larval densities recorded during night sampling at Guanabara Bay and in other studies (Bridger, 1956;Phonlor, 1973;Castro and Bonecker, 1996;Hettler et al, 1997) could be related to net avoidance by larger larvae during the day (Matsuura, 1977) and to vertical migration so that the larvae assembled near the bottom during the day and dispersed through the water column at night (Bridger, 1956;Bonecker et al, 2002). Other meroplanktonic organisms such as decapod larvae have a similar diurnal pattern in Guanabara Bay (Fernandes et al, 2002). Although tide cycle did not influence significantly larval densities in the present study, higher values during ebb and early flood tide at night sampling, could be an indication that fish larvae be exported from the bay at this period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…However, estuarine systems show a tendency to higher decapod concentrations. In Guanabara Bay, decapod densities ranged from 1.3 to 612 ind.m -3 in summer and from 0.4 to 788 ind.m -3 in winter, with brachyuran zoea frequently representing more than 90% of total (FERNANDES et al, 2002). In the Itamaracá estuarine system, mean decapod concentration was of 784.7 ind.m -3 , with brachyurans zoeae representing approximately 90.86% (SCHWAMBORN, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decapod larval ecology studies are scarce in Brazil and a proportion of these studies remain as unpublished thesis and monographs of limited availability. Published research includes studies of blue crabs and shrimps conducted by CALAZANS (2002) in the Patos Lagoon estuary, studies of shrimps (FEHLAUER & FREIRE, 2002;CALAZANS, 1994CALAZANS, , 1999 on the southern coast and studies of decapods in the Guanabara Bay (FERNANDES et al, 2002), on the eastern coast and in the Itamaracá estuarine system on the northeastern coast (SCHWAMBORN, 1997;SCHWAMBORN et al, 2001). Other data could be available in general zooplankton studies or in an thesis on mangrove crabs (A. S. Freire, unpublished data) or in the surf zone (J. G. Bersano, unpublished data).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ekman transport may carry eggs and larvae offshore, and depending on the extent of such advective transport, survival and growth rates of the fish larvae could be lowered (Spach, 1990). The only evidence of offshore transport impacting other zooplankton groups in the region are not related to wind-driven circulation, but rather to tidal transport of estuarine decapod larvae towards the shelf (Veloso and Valentin, 1993;Fernandes et al, 2002). Bakun and Parrish (1990) and Bakun (1996) have discussed the remarkable similarities between the Brazilian sardine and the California sardine stocks in terms of reproductive strategies.…”
Section: Influence Of Physical Processes On Zooplankton and Ichthyoplmentioning
confidence: 99%