2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-80342012000300012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parâmetros acústicos do contraste de sonoridade das plosivas no desenvolvimento fonológico típico e no desviante

Abstract: OBJETIVO: Investigar se as crianças com desvio fonológico apresentam características acústicas distintas de sons plosivos surdos e sonoros das crianças com desenvolvimento fonológico típico. MÉTODOS:Participaram do estudo 11 crianças com desenvolvimento fonológico típico e cinco com desvio fonológico e dificuldade na aquisição do traço [+voz] das consoantes plosivas. Por meio de palavras (['papa], ['baba], ['tata], ['dada], ['kaka] e ['gaga]) inseridas em frases-veículo, mediu-se o voice onset time, a duração … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of attempts of correct production of sounds, verified via spectrogram and, which were not previously identified by auditory perceptual analysis, has already been reported and confirmed by many studies of the area 1,5,6,10,11,[15][16][17][18] . A research 5 that also investigated the voicing contrast of the stop phones found that a group of children with speech and difficulty in stabilizing the feature [+ voice] did not distinguish acoustically the voiced x voiceless contrast. However, even though children with phonological disorders have not submitted to a differentiation of voicing through the investigated acoustic parameters (VOT, length of the vowel, length of the occlusion and burst amplitude), those ones showed a tendency to anchor on clues that are less robust during the attempt of implementing that contrast.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The observation of attempts of correct production of sounds, verified via spectrogram and, which were not previously identified by auditory perceptual analysis, has already been reported and confirmed by many studies of the area 1,5,6,10,11,[15][16][17][18] . A research 5 that also investigated the voicing contrast of the stop phones found that a group of children with speech and difficulty in stabilizing the feature [+ voice] did not distinguish acoustically the voiced x voiceless contrast. However, even though children with phonological disorders have not submitted to a differentiation of voicing through the investigated acoustic parameters (VOT, length of the vowel, length of the occlusion and burst amplitude), those ones showed a tendency to anchor on clues that are less robust during the attempt of implementing that contrast.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The introduction of acoustic spectrography in data interpretation of children with phonological disorders, has increasingly established itself as a practical and necessary tool during the speech assessment [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]10,11,[15][16][17][18] . The observation of attempts of correct production of sounds, verified via spectrogram and, which were not previously identified by auditory perceptual analysis, has already been reported and confirmed by many studies of the area 1,5,6,10,11,[15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acoustic analysis of speech and voice has been used for a long time as tool for analysis of altered cases, for promoting more accurate diagnoses, and as the monitoring procedure of the therapeutic process, both by speech language pathologist and by the patient (1)(2)(3)(4) . The articulatory analysis in the area of speech and orofacial motricity emerges as a new possibility, especially at the national level (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) , for integration of these analyses already mentioned, using, for example, the ultrasonography for evaluation of tongue movements (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) , and of the hyoid bone (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) , without inserting devices within the oral cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%