1998
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-790x1998000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alguns pilares para a apreciação da validade de estudos epidemiológicos

Abstract: Este trabalho foi parcialmente realizado no Medical Research Council -Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, quando MER foi apoiado pelo CNPq (nº 200122/82-7).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
27

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
7
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…At fi rst glance, nothing differentiates the execution of a psychometric study from any classic epidemiological study, since both require the same rigor in their processes. 49,50 In particular, it is of great interest to identify the domain of the population picked up in the study, thereby catching a glimpse of the extent to which the fi ndings may apply to the population among which the instrument will actually be used.…”
Section: Measurement Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At fi rst glance, nothing differentiates the execution of a psychometric study from any classic epidemiological study, since both require the same rigor in their processes. 49,50 In particular, it is of great interest to identify the domain of the population picked up in the study, thereby catching a glimpse of the extent to which the fi ndings may apply to the population among which the instrument will actually be used.…”
Section: Measurement Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it should be measured according to the dynamic at the time of the interview and is an important stage in the psychometric evaluation of instruments used in epidemiology. 15 This article reports the measuring of the test-retest reliability of the items on the scale of social capital resource providers in participants in the ELSA-Brasil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Não só importa a qua- lidade do processo de coleta, mas também a do instrumento utilizado. Para ser considerado válido, um instrumento deve ser capaz de captar adequadamente o evento ou o conceito subjacente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified