Análise da confiabilidade e da correlação de dois índices de estimativa da maturação esquelética: índice carpal e índice vertebral

Damian, Melissa Feres; Woitchunas, Fábio Eduardo; Cericato, Graziela Oro; Cechinato, Fernando; Moro, Graziela; Massochin, Michele Elisabete; Castoldi, F.

doi:10.1590/s1415-54192006000500012

Cited by 15 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, works comparing CV assessments to the analysis of ossification events in the hand and wrist did not verify significant statistical differences for intra-and inter-examiner agreement levels (SANTOS et al, 2005;DAMIAN et al, 2006;JAQUEIRA et al, 2010;SACHAN et al, 2011). Jaqueira et al (2010) carried out a study comparing three different CV-based methods to assess skeletal maturation and showed that the method proposed by Bacetti et al (2002) is the most reliable and reproducible one.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several authors (DAMIAN et al, 2006;KAMAL et al, 2006;JOSHI et al, 2010;MAYARÍ and LUGO, 2010;WARMELING et al, 2010;MARTINS et al, 2011;ALTAN et al, 2012;MAHAJAN, 2012;MAYARÍ, 2012;PRASAD et al, 2013) have made estimates of skeletal growth potential by assessing CV radiographically and comparing the data obtained to that retrieved from hand-wrist films. While not all papers from our sample verified the reliability of methods that estimate skeletal maturation based on CV assessments, most authors agreed that different CV evaluation methods can deliver satisfactory and sufficiently reliable estimates of the degree of skeletal maturation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, additional films and consequent exposure to radiation (handwrist radiograph) are waived (DAMIAN et al, 2006;KAMAL et al, 2006;MOSCATIELLO et al, 2008;MAYARI;LUGO, 2010;WARMELING et al, 2010;JOSHI et al, 2011;MARTINS et al, 2011;ALTAN et al, 2012;PRASAD et al, 2013). However, the greatest challenge in using CV as an indicator of skeletal maturation seems to be the correct staging described by Hassel and Farman (1995).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Given that lateral cephalometric radiographs are part of the standard orthodontic documentation, others have built upon Lamparski's original work (HASSEL;FARMAN, 1995;MARCELINO;TAVANO, 2005;DAMIAN et al, 2006;KAMAL et al, 2006;CALDAS et al, 2007;MOSCATIELLO et al, 2008) in order to establish the Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Index (CVMI) (Figure 1). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Reliability, efficacy and reproducibility of the cervical vertebrae maturation index (CVMI)

Cericato¹,

Freitas²,

Bittencourt³

et al. 2015

Biosci. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Assessing skeletal maturation is an important determinant of successful orthodontic treatment planning for children and adolescents. While several methods are used skeletal maturation assessment, the hand-wrist radiograph is one of the most widely used. However, it does require additional exposing growing patients to additional radiation. Information on skeletal maturation can also be retrieved after evaluation of cervical vertebrae, which are commonly portrayed on the lateral cephalometric radiographs included in standard orthodontic documentation. By means of a systematic review of the available literature, this work aimed to verify the reliability, efficacy, and reproducibility of skeletal age determination based on the evaluation of cervical vertebrae. The LILACS, SciELO and PubMed databases were searched using the keywords "cervical vertebrae" and "cervical maturation". Only texts in Portuguese, Spanish, and English published in the last 10 years were selected. Twenty-nine full articles were retrieved and critically appraised. According to these references, the Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Index appears to be a valid, reliable, and reproducible method for skeletal maturation assessment and may substitute the analysis of hand-wrist radiograph in orthodontic treatment planning.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reliability, efficacy and reproducibility of the cervical vertebrae maturation index (CVMI)

Cericato¹,

Freitas²,

Bittencourt³

et al. 2015

Biosci. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This intense growth is called pubertal growth spurge (PGS). This period is of the utmost importance in orthopedic orthodontic treatment, especially in cases of discrepancies of skeletal and dento-skeletal nature, because unlike dental disharmonies that can be solved at any time, if such divergences are not treated in this phase, the desired treatment results may not be achieved (4). PGS exhibits an increase in speed usually between 9 and 14 years of age.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative study of two skeletal maturation evaluation indexes

Warmeling¹,

Rodrigues²,

Zastrow³

et al. 2010

Rev. odonto ciênc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The present work consists of a comparative study of two indexes of skeletal maturation: the carpal index (SMI) and the vertebral index (CVMI) and verification of the reliability of the vertebral index in the determination of the stages of the skeletal maturation.Methods: Radiographies from the dental records of treated patients from Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL) were used. The sample was composed of 158 radiographies comprising seventy-nine carpal and seventy-nine lateral cephalometric radiographies of patients of both genders between six and eighteen of age. The carpal radiographies were analyzed using Martins' method and the lateral cephalometric, according to Baccetti, Franchi and McNamara Jr.Results: The Spearman's correlation test results showed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.616 between SMI and CVMI and the Pearson's test, of 0.698 for both genders (P<0.0001). The correlation between the indexes and the chronological age was 0.775 for SMI using Spearman's test, and 0.974 using Pearson's correlation test. For the CVMI, Spearman's correlation was 0.563 and Pearson's was 0.717, showing that there is a statistically significant correlation.Conclusion: The SMI is the safest and most trustworthy method to evaluate the skeletal maturation, although the CVMI can be used as a substitute method when there is conversance with the morphologic alterations of the vertebrae and when the carpal radiography is not available in the patient's orthodontic records.

show abstract

Utilização de diferentes métodos para a determinação da idade óssea em jovens

Pinto

Souza

Simões

et al. 2017

Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O estudo tem como objetivo correlacionar os resultados da idade óssea em meninos e meninas em diferentes métodos. Na metodologia para verificar a idade óssea, foram realizadas aferições de estatura, diâmetros de úmero e fêmur, perímetro corrigido de braço, dobra tricipital, idade cronológica para compor o modelo matemático, e raio-x de mão e punho para utilização do método de Grave e Brown (1976). No tratamento estatístico realizado no programa SPSS 20.0 utilizando estatística descritiva, correlação de Pearson e diferença significativa entre os métodos. As correlações obtiveram resultados positivos para meninos e meninas, respectivamente, com resultados entre raio x e idade cronológica (M=0,84/F=0,53), modelo matemático (M=0,85/F=0,56) e estatura (M=0,80/F=0,28), assim como entre o modelo matemático e estatura (M=0,95/ F=0,84) e idade cronológica (M=0,95/F=0,76). Concluímos, desta forma, existir correlação entre os métodos, não existindo diferença significativa entre os mesmos, destacando assim o modelo matemático por ser um método prático e de fácil aplicação para uso no meio esportivo.

show abstract

Análise da confiabilidade e da correlação de dois índices de estimativa da maturação esquelética: índice carpal e índice vertebral

Cited by 15 publications

References 5 publications

Reliability, efficacy and reproducibility of the cervical vertebrae maturation index (CVMI)

Reliability, efficacy and reproducibility of the cervical vertebrae maturation index (CVMI)

Comparative study of two skeletal maturation evaluation indexes

Utilização de diferentes métodos para a determinação da idade óssea em jovens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About