2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-475738320150009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

small ORFs: A new class of essential genes for development

Abstract: Genes that contain small open reading frames (smORFs) constitute a new group of eukaryotic genes and are expected to represent 5% of the Drosophila melanogaster transcribed genes. In this review we provide a historical perspective of their recent discovery, describe their general mechanism and discuss the importance of smORFs for future genomic and transcriptomic studies. Finally, we discuss the biological role of the most studied smORF so far, the Mlpt/Pri/Tal gene in arthropods. The pleiotropic action of Mlp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beause mlpt does not act as a gap gene in Drosophila (Galindo et al, ), this smORF was recruited into the gene regulatory network of early patterning during insect evolution. Whether mlpt acts as a gap gene role in basal hemiptera such as Rhodnius is an important question (Albuquerque et al ., ). Preliminary analysis indicates that mlpt is a gap gene in Rhodnius and also essential for nymphal metamorphosis during post embryonic stages (Tobias‐Santos and Nunes da Fonseca, unpublished observation).…”
Section: Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beause mlpt does not act as a gap gene in Drosophila (Galindo et al, ), this smORF was recruited into the gene regulatory network of early patterning during insect evolution. Whether mlpt acts as a gap gene role in basal hemiptera such as Rhodnius is an important question (Albuquerque et al ., ). Preliminary analysis indicates that mlpt is a gap gene in Rhodnius and also essential for nymphal metamorphosis during post embryonic stages (Tobias‐Santos and Nunes da Fonseca, unpublished observation).…”
Section: Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These criteria result in an important underestimation of translated ORFs in the genome (Andrews and Rothnagel 2014;Saghatelian and Couso 2015;Couso and Patraquim 2017;Plaza et al 2017). With functional evidence for previously unannotated ORFs in bacteria (Wadler and Vanderpool 2007;Hemm et al 2008Hemm et al , 2010Storz et al 2014;Lluch-Senar et al 2015;Baek et al 2017), Drosophila (Galindo et al 2007;Kondo et al 2007;Reinhardt et al 2013;Aspden et al 2014;Albuquerque et al 2015;Li et al 2016a;Pueyo et al 2016a), plants (Hanada et al 2013;Juntawong et al 2014;Hsu et al 2016;Hsu and Benfey 2017), and other eukaryotes (Oyama et al 2007;Ingolia et al 2011;Vanderperre et al 2013;Ma et al 2014), genome annotations will need to be revised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two classes of peptides are now acknowledged to be present in the cell but with rare functional annotation . The likely reason for this disparity is the lack of tools to measure the presence and activity of these peptides.…”
Section: Targeted Proteomics: What Does It Bring For Researchers At Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[64] These two classes of peptides are now acknowledged to be present in the cell but with rare functional annotation. [65][66][67] The likely reason for this disparity is the lack of tools to measure the presence and activity of these peptides. While there is emerging literature regarding the structural roles played by noncoding RNAs to inhibit or activate proteins, it is even more feasible for small peptides capable of mimicking folds and turns of a protein, which can easily block the active site or result in a change of confirmation.…”
Section: Peptidomics: Targeted Proteomics For Annotated or Unannotatedmentioning
confidence: 99%