2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232013000800022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized clinical trial on the effects of remote intercessory prayer in the adverse outcomes of pregnancies

Abstract: The scope of this article was to investigate whether intercessory prayer (IP) influences the adverse outcomes of pregnancies. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 564 pregnant women attending a prenatal public health care service. The women were randomly assigned to an IP group or to a control group (n = 289 per group). They were simultaneously and randomly assigned to practice prayer off-site or not. The following parameters were evaluated: Apgar scores, type of delivery and birth weig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The papers had been published in several health journals, two of which related to complementary and alternative practices [22,25]. Six articles had been published over the past decade [23][24][25]27,33,34] and only two in the 1990s [28,32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The papers had been published in several health journals, two of which related to complementary and alternative practices [22,25]. Six articles had been published over the past decade [23][24][25]27,33,34] and only two in the 1990s [28,32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive outcomes comprised the reduction of anxiety of mothers of children with cancer, as well as a decrease in the level of concern of the participants who believe there is a solution to their problem, and the improved physical functioning of individuals who believe in prayer (Table 1). Seven studies had been conducted in the USA [23][24][25][26][27][28][29], one in South Korea [30], one in Israel [31], one in the UK [32] and two did not identify the origin [33,34]. The papers had been published in several health journals, two of which related to complementary and alternative practices [22,25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations