2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0303-76572009000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estratégia de avaliação do risco de lesões músculo-esqueléticas de membros superiores ligadas ao trabalho aplicada na indústria de abate e desmancha de carne em Portugal

Abstract: OBJECTIVO: As lesões músculo-esqueléticas ligadas ao trabalho (LMELT) são doenças profissionais frequentes. Neste estudo ensaiou-se uma estratégia de diagnóstico do risco e de vigilância da saúde dos trabalhadores numa empresa de abate e desmancha de carne. MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se uma estratégia de obtenção de informação em todos os postos de trabalho e trabalhadores da empresa. Utilizaram-se: (i) adaptação do Questionário Nórdico Músculo-Esquelético, incluindo caracterização da exposição biomecânica; (ii) protoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The main body angles (head/neck, trunk and arms) were assessed according to the methodology proposed by Kapitaniac [9] by the same four raters in loco consensus observing the frames. Angle measurements were performed using the (Table 1) on three different levels [10]: acceptable, conditionally acceptable and not acceptable. It was also taken into account whether the radiographer was in a static (no movement) or dynamic posture (performing tasks associated with positioning requiring movement of the joints, namely the shoulder, elbow, knees and neck) [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main body angles (head/neck, trunk and arms) were assessed according to the methodology proposed by Kapitaniac [9] by the same four raters in loco consensus observing the frames. Angle measurements were performed using the (Table 1) on three different levels [10]: acceptable, conditionally acceptable and not acceptable. It was also taken into account whether the radiographer was in a static (no movement) or dynamic posture (performing tasks associated with positioning requiring movement of the joints, namely the shoulder, elbow, knees and neck) [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale is used for estimating effort and exertion, breathlessness and fatigue during physical work. The Borg CR10 scale is a category ratio (CR) scale based on the number 10, which represents extreme intensities [10]. Also, it was asked about the equipment characteristics, namely: control station height, accessibility of the monitor, accessibility of compression devices, accessibility of the compression paddles and intensity of the positioning light.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the health status, the first question of the Portuguese version of the 12-item short form Health Survey (Sf-12:v2) was used (Cunha-Miranda, Vaz-Patto, Micaelo, Teixeira, Silva, Saraiva-Ribeiro, 2010). Work-related information gathered the subjective information concerning work characteristics (Serranheira et al, 2008), musculoskeletal symptoms existence and its association to work. Other information, like service time or worker's age, was extracted from the company.…”
Section: Online Questionnaire (Work4health® Platform)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the introduction of new processes and automation decreased considerably some physical demands for the worker, assembly lines are associated to dynamic and high physical work tasks, as to repetitive movements and awkward postures, particularly in extreme joint positions with force application, as to poor recovery time (Buckley, 2016;Edimansyah et al, 2008;Graham, Agnew, & Stevenson, 2009;Holtermann et al, 2010;Landau et al, 2008;Sancini et al, 2013;Serranheira, Uva, & Lopes, 2008;Sluiter, 2006;Sundstrup et al, 2013aSundstrup et al, , 2016. Assembly lines are related to occupational health risks, work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD), particularly of the neck and upper limbs (WULMSD) and absenteeism (Eatough, Way, & Chang, 2012;Gold, d'Errico, Katz, Gore, & Punnett, 2009;Hagberg et al, 2012;Kitis, Celik, Aslan, & Zencir, 2009;Pullopdissakul, Ekpanyaskul, Taptagaporn, Bundhukul, & Thepchatri, 2013;Sadi, MacDermid, Chesworth, & Birmingham, 2007;Sancini et al, 2013;Spallek, Kuhn, Uibel, van Mark, & Quarcoo, 2010;Wang et al, 2009;Zebis et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such disorders are source of studies performed by some researchers, being named in the literature by Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WRMSD) [3]- [7]. The WRMSD symptoms can appear immediately or hours, days, months or even years later through continuous exposition [8] from centralized pains in the affected body area, resulting in complaints by workers to their employers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%