2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66322010000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclease p1 immobilized on deae cellulose

Abstract: -Effects of various factors, such as pH, ionic strength, glutaraldehyde concentration, enzyme amount and immobilization time, on enzyme activity were investigated. The immobilization conditions were optimized by orthogonal experiments. Characterizations of immobilized nuclease p1 were also evaluated. Through orthogonal optimization, the optimal immobilization conditions were as follows: pH 5.6, ionic strength 0.125, glutaraldehyde concentration 0.20% and immobilization time 2.0 h. Optimal pH of immobilized enz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results are similar to the immobilization of nuclease p1 on DEAE-cellulose (Shi et al, 2010). DEAE-cellulose can absorb a lot of spores in a short time, but the spore distribution on the fiber surface is not uniform (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The current results are similar to the immobilization of nuclease p1 on DEAE-cellulose (Shi et al, 2010). DEAE-cellulose can absorb a lot of spores in a short time, but the spore distribution on the fiber surface is not uniform (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The biotransformation of natural products is usually conducted under mild conditions, rather than at an improper pH, high salt concentration, high substrate concentration, and high temperature. Thus, the use of immobilized enzymes in transformation of natural products effectively avoids detachment from the DEAE-52 cellulose carrier due to such improper reaction conditions (Bai et al, 2005;Karboune et al, 2005;Shi et al, 2010;Ashraf et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the immobilized enzyme retained its higher activity at pH≥6.5 while free enzyme retained its higher activity at pH≤6.5. These small changes of enzymic activity with pH may be attributed to the effect of the negativelycharged support for enzyme immobilization which will result in a basic shift in the pH optimum (Goldstein et al, 1964;Shi et al, 2010). …”
Section: Optimal Ph For Immobilized Enzymementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kumar et al had reported that the optimal pH of the trypsin binding to Eudragit S-100 moved to the acidic region (47). In addition, other enzymes immobilized onto the chitosan carrier have changed its optimal pH (48,49). Therefore, it shows that the difference in the micro-environmental pH is not the unique factor for influencing the optimal pH of immobilized enzymes.…”
Section: The Optimal Ph For Free and Immobilized Trypsinmentioning
confidence: 99%