2019
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-59702019000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Resumo A partir de estudo sobre a Comissão Técnica Nacional de Biotecnologia, órgão que concentra as competências de regulação de organismos geneticamente modificados no Brasil, o artigo apresenta uma análise, fundamentada na abordagem interacionista de Goffman, sobre sua atuação. Analisa a comissão como um teatro onde diferentes peritos realizam performances, atuam num palco, com uma plateia, bastidores e conflitos em relação aos papéis representados. Por meio de tais estratégias é possível entender o process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A powerful weapon for coping with this power is the organization of society, as seen in Syngenta's attempts to patent seeds with Terminator technology and a wide-coverage patent on various vital genetic sequences of rice, which were barred, thanks to the action of the ETC Group (Ribeiro, 2011). For Fonseca and Guivant (2019), however, with the approval of the new Biosecurity Law in 2005, there was a political weakening movement of the movement opposed to the process of transgenization of agriculture, while the transgenic production area and the commercial approval of new varieties of GMOs grew. The author may be right, because, in the case of the labeling of transgenic foods, passes in the Senate a bill already approved in the House that will make it much more difficult to detect the presence of transgenic DNA from ingredients derived from soybean or transgenic corn, present in the vast majority of processed foods, such as soy lecithin, and corn glucose (Cortese, 2018;Cortese, Martinelli, Fabri, Melgarejo, Nodari & Cavalli, 2017).…”
Section: Release Of Transgenic Soybean and Corn Plants By Ctnbio: The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful weapon for coping with this power is the organization of society, as seen in Syngenta's attempts to patent seeds with Terminator technology and a wide-coverage patent on various vital genetic sequences of rice, which were barred, thanks to the action of the ETC Group (Ribeiro, 2011). For Fonseca and Guivant (2019), however, with the approval of the new Biosecurity Law in 2005, there was a political weakening movement of the movement opposed to the process of transgenization of agriculture, while the transgenic production area and the commercial approval of new varieties of GMOs grew. The author may be right, because, in the case of the labeling of transgenic foods, passes in the Senate a bill already approved in the House that will make it much more difficult to detect the presence of transgenic DNA from ingredients derived from soybean or transgenic corn, present in the vast majority of processed foods, such as soy lecithin, and corn glucose (Cortese, 2018;Cortese, Martinelli, Fabri, Melgarejo, Nodari & Cavalli, 2017).…”
Section: Release Of Transgenic Soybean and Corn Plants By Ctnbio: The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, a CTNBio possuía a competência de decisão para a aprovação de pesquisas e comercialização de produtos principalmente relacionados a OGMs. Entretanto, a legislação existente não era apropriada para a realidade do constante avanço do desenvolvimento das tecnologias, evidenciando uma exigência por melhores qualificações legais por parte de investidores e da comunidade científica (FONSECA;GUIVANT, 2019).…”
Section: Regulação Para Biotecnologia No Brasilunclassified
“…This tendency has been consolidated in the last decade through the activities of National Technical Commission on Biotechnology (CTNBio), the organisation that regulates genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Brazil. Based on a study of the CTNBio, Fonseca and Guivant (2019) concluded that the organisation has successfully managed conflicts behind the scenes, constructing decision-making processes as having taken place impartially, without any political interference or personal interests. Nevertheless, particularly with regards to the approval process of pesticides, non-transparent and value-based decision-making have co-produced an alignment between regulatory science and public policy precriptions, where there is little perceived justification for public participation in governance processes.…”
Section: Science Technology and Innovation Governance In The Uk And mentioning
confidence: 99%