2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-56872010000300013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolução temporal e atenção seletiva de indivíduos com zumbido

Abstract: tinnitus did not interfere in the auditory abilities of selective attention and temporal resolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The author justified these findings with the fact that the data were not selected from a specialized medical service, nor had the subjects received any kind of tinnitus treatment. Thus, the author affirmed that the individuals of the study presented low distress caused by tinnitus and demonstrated their ability to change the focus of attention in their daily activities 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The author justified these findings with the fact that the data were not selected from a specialized medical service, nor had the subjects received any kind of tinnitus treatment. Thus, the author affirmed that the individuals of the study presented low distress caused by tinnitus and demonstrated their ability to change the focus of attention in their daily activities 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As to the case of temporal resolution, there is no consensus in literature about the alteration of this skill in subjects with tinnitus. In a previous investigation (25) , for example, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups with and without tinnitus regarding the GIN. But, in another study (26) , it was seen that subjects with tinnitus had some impairment in the auditory skills for temporal resolution.…”
Section: Behavioral Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Finally, the identification gap percentage was calculated using the total number of hits over the total number of gaps. If, however, the individual submit more than two false positives thereafter, each false positives were discounted from the total number of hits and hence identifying gaps percentage decreased 9 . It is called "recognition", the number of times that participants demonstrated to have identified the stimulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies are unanimous in noting that the music is beneficial to humans. It was in national and international literature 8,9,18,[20][21][22] who described values ranging from 3.98 ms to 5.05 ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%