2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302007000400025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resultados do tratamento do carcinoma espinocelular anal e do seu precursor em doentes HIV-positivos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from a series of epidemiologic studies conclude that HPV infection is central to anal cancer development as well [2, 14]. In fact, the presence of HPV DNA in SCCAs is so high (ranging in the literature 35–60%) [15], it suggests that HPV presence may be a necessary cause for squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal [16].…”
Section: Current Understanding Of Sccamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from a series of epidemiologic studies conclude that HPV infection is central to anal cancer development as well [2, 14]. In fact, the presence of HPV DNA in SCCAs is so high (ranging in the literature 35–60%) [15], it suggests that HPV presence may be a necessary cause for squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal [16].…”
Section: Current Understanding Of Sccamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also is likely that variations in the E6 gene sequence may allow evasion from the host immune system, which would result in increased viral persistence [28]. A mechanistic possibility is that HPV induces high‐grade dysplasia by integrating into host DNA and/or inhibiting the p53 protein, possibly through the interaction of E6 proteins with host factor E6AP ubiquitin ligase, binding p53 and causing its degradation [15]. The p53 gene is frequently wild‐type in HPV‐related cervical cancers, and the same is likely in SCCA.…”
Section: Current Understanding Of Sccamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Atualmente, doentes HIV-positivo que apresentam CD4 superior a esse nível e carga viral sérica indetectável não são considerados imunodeprimidos graves e são tratados da mesma forma que os soronegativos. [16][17][18] Há autores que não observaram diferenças com esse tratamento nessa população quando comparada à dos soronegativos para o HIV, 18,19 embora outros tenham referido aumento da toxicidade do esquema nos doentes soropositivos. 5,[11][12][13] Estudos comparando doentes imunodeprimidos e imunocompetentes vêm mostrado, respectivamente, envolvimento linfonodal em 60% e 17%, recidivas em 75% e 6%, boa resposta à radio e quimioterapia em 62% e 85%, toxicidade a esse tratamento em 80% e 30%, e sobrevivência global de 1,4 e 5,3 anos.…”
unclassified