2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-14282004000300017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência das condições reacionais nas características de copolímeros de metacrilato de metila e divinilbenzeno obtidos por polimerização em suspensão

Abstract: Resumo: Foram sintetizados copolímeros esféricos e porosos à base de metacrilato de metila e divinilbenzeno através de polimerização em suspensão aquosa utilizando metil-etil-cetona (MEK) e ciclo-hexano (CH) como diluentes. Diferentes estruturas morfológicas foram obtidas através da modificação dos parâmetros reacionais tais como teor de divinilbenzeno e razão MEK/CH. Os copolímeros foram caracterizados por porosimetria de mercúrio, análise de área específica, densidade aparente e microscopia ótica. Foram obti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, any difference in the density “ d ” of the packed spherical beads of porous methyl methacrylate–divinylbenzene should be related to pore volume “ V m ” of the beads. This deduction is supported by the plot of the densities verses pore volumes from this study and from literature22 as illustrated in Figure 6. The best fit equation to the data is the following second degree polynomial: where “ V e ” is the estimated pore volume.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, any difference in the density “ d ” of the packed spherical beads of porous methyl methacrylate–divinylbenzene should be related to pore volume “ V m ” of the beads. This deduction is supported by the plot of the densities verses pore volumes from this study and from literature22 as illustrated in Figure 6. The best fit equation to the data is the following second degree polynomial: where “ V e ” is the estimated pore volume.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“… Plot of densities versus pore volumes: Crosses are the experimental values from this study, thick line is the best‐fit equation eq. (7) based on the crosses and triangles are the experimental values obtained from Ref 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique provided an indication of polymer porosity as a function of different degrees of opacity, such as: transparency, diaphanous and opaque [22] . According to the literature, opaque beads have a structural heterogeneity, which not allows the passage of light through the polymer structure, unlike transparent beads [22,23] . This fact is associated to greater refraction of the light passing through the beads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact is associated to greater refraction of the light passing through the beads. All the polymers reported in this manuscript presented opaque beads with spherical morphology [22,23] . The solubility parameter (δ) influences the porous nature of polymer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when the solubility parameters of polymer and solvent are near each other, the two substances will mix spontaneously. When the modulus of this difference is greater than 1.5, the polymer and solvent phases separate, causing the formation of pores. Combining diluents in different proportions allows obtaining a diversified porous structure, adequate to the desired usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%