2020
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-12902020190886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La eSalud en España: evolución, estado actual y perspectivas de futuro

Abstract: Resumen Ofrecer un análisis pormenorizado de la evolución e implantación de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC) en el ámbito sanitario -eSalud- en España, atendiendo a los principales servicios implementados, su situación actual y sus perspectivas de futuro, así como a su posible impacto en el sistema sanitario y particularmente en sus usuarios. Se ha revisado la literatura científica sobre eSalud para identificar los servicios implementados más extendidos y sus características. En funció… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teletherapy via videoconferencing, especially in group format, was introduced during the lockdown, but the percentage of patients who received it was lower in comparison with the over the phone modality. The preference for over the phone interventions may be explained by the scarcity of online platforms available within the Spanish public healthcare system [ 40 ], and perhaps also by certain limitations associated with videoconferencing, such as the difficulty of its use [ 41 ], poor training [ 42 ], or the perception that videoconferencing may increase the clinical workload [ 43 ]. Also, previous findings indicate that patients with SMI prefer using the telephone rather than videoconferencing, as they believe it reduces the intensity of the sessions [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teletherapy via videoconferencing, especially in group format, was introduced during the lockdown, but the percentage of patients who received it was lower in comparison with the over the phone modality. The preference for over the phone interventions may be explained by the scarcity of online platforms available within the Spanish public healthcare system [ 40 ], and perhaps also by certain limitations associated with videoconferencing, such as the difficulty of its use [ 41 ], poor training [ 42 ], or the perception that videoconferencing may increase the clinical workload [ 43 ]. Also, previous findings indicate that patients with SMI prefer using the telephone rather than videoconferencing, as they believe it reduces the intensity of the sessions [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%