2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162013000600005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ rumen degradation kinetics as affected by type of pasture and date of harvest

Abstract: However, it is necessary to consider other variables that determine the productive performance such as DM intake and rumen fermentation products.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As with other studies, cultivars selected for a high sugar concentration have lower CP and NDF to counter the elevated WSC concentration [45,47]. Additionally, in agreement with the literature, it was observed in our study that grass pastures typically have less WSC, more CP and NDF concentrations, but similar OM and NDF digestibility in autumn, compared with spring [40,48].…”
Section: Chemical Composition and In Vitro Gas Production Of Foragesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with other studies, cultivars selected for a high sugar concentration have lower CP and NDF to counter the elevated WSC concentration [45,47]. Additionally, in agreement with the literature, it was observed in our study that grass pastures typically have less WSC, more CP and NDF concentrations, but similar OM and NDF digestibility in autumn, compared with spring [40,48].…”
Section: Chemical Composition and In Vitro Gas Production Of Foragesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The chemical composition of treatments is similar to values reported in autumn and spring for grass pastures in humid temperate regions [13,40]. However, the concentrations of WSC observed in this study for both cultivars, especially in the high sugar treatment (322 and 343 g/kg for autumn and spring, respectively) were greater than what is commonly reported for PRG pastures (74 to 243 g/kg) [41].…”
Section: Chemical Composition and In Vitro Gas Production Of Foragesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The degradation rate of NDF in the rumen was higher than the degradation rate of ADF [18]. The results are shown in Table -3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The HHM treatment was generated by delaying the regrowth period before the start of the study in relation to the regrowth period of MHM (+15 days of regrowth), which may influence fiber concentration in the pasture and, consequently, its digestibility [2,28]. However, the higher content of pre-grazing ADF and during the first 120 min of the first GS in HHM did not affect the concentration of DOMD, as fiber digestibility in a vegetative leafy spring pasture is high (>800 g/kg) and therefore an increase in ADF does not necessarily result in lower DOMD [29]. According to Chapman et al [30], the decline in the digestibility of the pasture is more related to the progress of the growing season and, therefore, by the location of the leaves insertion points on the tiller axis during the pasture growth cycle.…”
Section: Nutritive Value Of the Pasture During The Grazing Down Procementioning
confidence: 99%