2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162013000500004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Due to new possibilities for using sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) trash for electricity generation, and the production of 2 nd generation ethanol and others chemicals, the interest for its recovery has increased. However, the question of how much trash can be removed from sugarcane field still needs to be clarified. This study evaluated the amount of dry matter, nutrients content, structural compounds and efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis of the hydrothermal pretreated materials for tops and dry leaves in sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
1
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
56
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these ratios varied according to the variety. The indexes showing the ratio of the Top Leaves Dry Mass (TLDM) to Stem Mass (SM) are between 0.074 and 0.121; therefore, the TLDM accounts for approximately 10 % of the stem mass, which was similar to the observations of Miocque (1999) and Franco et al (2013). The Stem Straw Dry Mass (SSDM) ratio to SM ranged from 0.071 to 0.094.…”
Section: Relationship Among Straw Stem Straw and Top Leaves In Sugarsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these ratios varied according to the variety. The indexes showing the ratio of the Top Leaves Dry Mass (TLDM) to Stem Mass (SM) are between 0.074 and 0.121; therefore, the TLDM accounts for approximately 10 % of the stem mass, which was similar to the observations of Miocque (1999) and Franco et al (2013). The Stem Straw Dry Mass (SSDM) ratio to SM ranged from 0.071 to 0.094.…”
Section: Relationship Among Straw Stem Straw and Top Leaves In Sugarsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The straw mass generated is an intrinsic characteristic of a cultivar and ranges from 8 to 23 % of the stem weight (Franco et al, 2013) and 14 % of the dry weight (Paes and Oliveira, 2005). It is crucial to determine the amount of residual dry mass that should remain on the soil and the amount that can be removed after harvest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, a seleção do material que será retirado do solo também deve ser considerada na avaliação das emissões de GEE induzidas pela quantidade de palha de cana-de-açúcar depositada sobre a superfície. Segundo Franco et al (2013), as folhas que já estão secas no momento da colheita apresentam composição química favorável para a produção de etanol de segunda geração, enquanto os ponteiros (folhas ainda verdes) não são tão interessantes para esse fim, pois diminuem o rendimento. Entretanto, esse material representa uma importante fonte de nutrientes para a soqueira de cana-de-açúcar.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Against the claiming demand to use this biomass for bioenergy generation, the Brazilian sugarcane sector has considered the partial removal of the post-harvest residues from soil surface without harming sustainability and yields [2]. On the other hand, the sugar and bioethanol industry generate large amounts of filter cake and vinasse, residues that are applied to sugarcane fields as conditioners and organic fertilizers [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%