Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
4
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
23
4
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparent herbage harvested was greater for entries 4F and 10 (Table 2) compared with all others, and total annual herbage harvested was 33 and 28% greater for those entries, respectively, than for Floralta. This result for the LI95 treatment is different than what has been proposed for other C4 grasses by several authors (Carnevalli et al, 2006;Barbosa et al, 2007;da Silva and Nascimento, 2007;Sbrissia et al, 2007;Pereira et al, 2014). These data show that LI80-SH30 had the least apparent herbage harvested by grazing for any management treatment combination during 2012, while in 2013, it was not different from LI80-SH20 or LI95-SH30, and respectively).…”
Section: Herbage Accumulated and Apparent Herbage Harvested By Grazingcontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Apparent herbage harvested was greater for entries 4F and 10 (Table 2) compared with all others, and total annual herbage harvested was 33 and 28% greater for those entries, respectively, than for Floralta. This result for the LI95 treatment is different than what has been proposed for other C4 grasses by several authors (Carnevalli et al, 2006;Barbosa et al, 2007;da Silva and Nascimento, 2007;Sbrissia et al, 2007;Pereira et al, 2014). These data show that LI80-SH30 had the least apparent herbage harvested by grazing for any management treatment combination during 2012, while in 2013, it was not different from LI80-SH20 or LI95-SH30, and respectively).…”
Section: Herbage Accumulated and Apparent Herbage Harvested By Grazingcontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…When managed with long regrowth intervals that allow canopy light interception to exceed 95% (e.g., maximum light interception-LImax), sward herbage mass is greater but with a higher proportion of stem and dead material relative to leaf, resulting in greater total dry matter production, but smaller leaf dry matter yield [84] and lower nutritive value of the produced herbage [89]. In addition, long grazing intervals characterized by the pre-grazing target of LImax result in a greater proportion of the produced herbage being lost to the soil as a consequence of physical damage and/or rejection, decreasing the efficiency of the grazing process [85,90,91]. The investment in stem elongation results in taller swards with an increased proportion of stems in the upper layers of their vertical profile [92], increasing the difficulty of grazing and in maintaining the post-grazing management targets [93,94].…”
Section: Morphological Plant Types and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investment in stem elongation results in taller swards with an increased proportion of stems in the upper layers of their vertical profile [92], increasing the difficulty of grazing and in maintaining the post-grazing management targets [93,94]. As a result, the benefit of greater total herbage accumulation is offset by the greater grazing losses when long regrowth intervals are used, indicating that, although herbage accumulation per grazing cycle is smaller when managing with shorter grazing intervals (LI95%), the more frequent defoliation results in larger number of grazing cycles and total herbage accumulation (with higher leaf proportion) than when managing with longer grazing intervals (LImax) [84,91,94,95].…”
Section: Morphological Plant Types and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) ratio of the soil solution affect the recovery and efficiency of nitrogen use, dry matter yield and chemical composition of pastures (Primavesi et al, 2006a;Silva et al, 2013;Silveira et al, 2013). Therefore, studies of evaluation of use and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers, applied at different times, are important.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%