2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162011000100013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen fertilizer leaching in an Oxisol cultivated with sugarcane

Abstract: Nitrogen (N) leaching below the crop-rooting zone represents not only a valuable loss of nutrients for the plant, but also a potential pollution source of groundwater. The objective of this work was to quantify leaching losses of native N and that derived from fertilizer in an Oxisol that was cultivated with sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) during the crop plant cycle. The sugarcane was planted and fertilized with urea in the planting furrow, with 120 kg ha -1 of N. In order to determine the fate of the ferti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Boaretto et al (2007) report that for citrus trees, the absorption of N is hindered in rainy periods due to leaching losses. According to Oliveira et al (2002) and Franco et al (2008) N losses by leaching may be negligible because most of the 15 N studies in sugarcane indicate very little leaching losses, as also recently reported by Ghiberto et al (2011), however, for Silva et al (2006) and Duete et al (2008) these low losses cannot be disregarded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Boaretto et al (2007) report that for citrus trees, the absorption of N is hindered in rainy periods due to leaching losses. According to Oliveira et al (2002) and Franco et al (2008) N losses by leaching may be negligible because most of the 15 N studies in sugarcane indicate very little leaching losses, as also recently reported by Ghiberto et al (2011), however, for Silva et al (2006) and Duete et al (2008) these low losses cannot be disregarded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, NIs are not commonly used in Brazil because they add cost to fertilizers and because these products do not always bring yield increases (Trenkel, 2010), especially in situations where N loss by nitrate leaching is low. Cantarella (2007), Ghiberto et al (2009), andGhiberto et al (2011) observed very little NO 3 -leaching from N fertilizers in sugarcane using fertilizers labeled with 15 N. Although losses of N as N 2 O are environmentally important, they are a small fraction of fertilizer costs, and sugarcane growers may not be willing to pay the cost of NIs if no yield increases accompany this environmental benefit. Mitigating N 2 O emissions from agriculture may, therefore, require broader approaches, such as the internationalization of costs of GHG abatement Venterea et al, 2012), in addition to the technical solutions found by researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaching losses, which could be reduced by the NI or CRF treatments, are considered to be of little significance for sugarcane grown in the southeastern region of Brazil (Ghiberto et al, 2009(Ghiberto et al, , 2011. To minimize soil variability and to focus on the GHG evaluations, the treatments were concentrated in a small area of a sugarcane field with a uniform plant stand.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016 DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2016000900001 Nutrient losses by leaching in sugarcane fields have been studied in Brazil, mainly in the state of São Paulo. Among the factors that determine leaching losses, can be mentioned: crop stage, fertilizer doses and solubility, and rainfall distribution in the region (Oliveira et al, 2001;Cantarella et al, 2007;Ghiberto et al, 2011). Table 4 shows nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium drainage and losses in a sugarcane crop in the municipality of Pirassununga, in the state of São Paulo, in a sandy clay loam Latossolo, with mean sand content of 680 g kg -1 in the 0 to 1-m layer.…”
Section: Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%