2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162010000500010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertilizer distribution mechanisms and side dress nitrogen fertilization in upland rice under no-tillage system

Abstract: Some crops have shown not to adapt to the no-tillage system (NTS) as a consequence of the compaction of the superficial soil layer. In a certain way, the mechanism used in seeders to open furrows for the deposition of fertilizers can have great importance in facilitating root penetration. This study was carried out to evaluate the influence of two fertilizer distribution mechanisms and N fertilization in upland rice (Oryza sativa) under NTS. The experiment was carried out in the growing seasons 2001/2002 and 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, Table 2). Similar studies reported that these growth indicators increased with more N supply in the soil 31,32 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, Table 2). Similar studies reported that these growth indicators increased with more N supply in the soil 31,32 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Similar studies reported that these growth indicators increased with more N supply in the soil. 31,32 In addition, our study revealed that the length of water mimosa in the NB treatment was higher than that in MB and SB treatments (Fig. 2(J), and (L)).…”
Section: Effects Of Intercropping On Rice and Water Mimosa Growthmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As a comparison, previous research found that crop yield increased with N fertilizer levels [40,41]. It is acknowledged that higher grain yield was obtained due to higher panicle numbers [40]. Similar to rice yield, reduced and conventional N treatments also had higher rice effective panicle numbers than zero N treatments (Table 1).…”
Section: Yield and Yield Components Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the present research, compared with zero N treatment, the reduced and conventional N treatments substantially increased the yield of rice and water mimosa (Table 1). As a comparison, previous research found that crop yield increased with N fertilizer levels [40,41]. It is acknowledged that higher grain yield was obtained due to higher panicle numbers [40].…”
Section: Yield and Yield Components Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, upland rice grain yield at NTS is lower than in the conventional tillage (Crusciol et al 2010;Kluthcouski et al 2000). One explanation given for the decrease in crop grain yield would be the low-nitrate assimilation capacity of rice seedlings, due to the low activity of the nitrate reductase (NR) enzyme in the early development phase, prior to the tillering stage (Araújo et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%