2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162010000200014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models

Abstract: In biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical comparisons between van Genuchten parameters from different samplings was carried out using procedures described in Carvalho et al (2010), with the likelihood ratio test (p < 0.05). This method tested the following hypotheses: (a) the van Genuchten parameters are equal in successive samplings; and (b) one or more van Genuchten parameters are different in successive samplings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical comparisons between van Genuchten parameters from different samplings was carried out using procedures described in Carvalho et al (2010), with the likelihood ratio test (p < 0.05). This method tested the following hypotheses: (a) the van Genuchten parameters are equal in successive samplings; and (b) one or more van Genuchten parameters are different in successive samplings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these hypotheses, the following models were adjusted: = unrestricted model, where the two parameters (NMR or NR max T and b) were adjusted for each period; 1 = restricted model, where the NMR or NR max T parameter is common for both periods; 2 = restricted model, where the b parameter is common for both periods; 3 = restricted model, with all parameters common for both periods. The likelihood ratio test was used to test these hypotheses according to statistical procedures proposed by Regazzi (2003) and Carvalho et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%