2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162009000100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chelating agents to solubilize heavy metals from Oxisols contaminated by the addition of organic and inorganic residues

Abstract: Phytoremediation is an attractive technique for soils contaminated with heavy metals, especially in conjunction with chelating agents to assist metal phytoextraction. Nevertheless, their studies in Brazil are rare. Thus, the objective of the present work was to evaluate the efficiency of the chelating agents EDDS and EDTA for the solubilization of heavy metals from two Oxisols contaminated by organic sources in Jaguariúna (LVJ) and inorganic sources in Paulínia (LVP), São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil. Firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this technique, soil is amended with certain chemicals, such as synthetic organic chelates {DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), CDTA (trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N ,N -tetraacetic acid), EGTA (ethylene glycol-[-aminoethyl ether]-N,N,N_,N_-tetra-acetic acid), EDDHA (ethylenediamine-di(o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid), NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid), HEDTA (hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid), EDDS (ethylenediamine-disuccinic acid), citric acid, and elemental sulfur (S)}, to increase the heavy-metal bioavailability in soil and thus enhance phytoextraction by plant and translocation of heavy metals from the roots to the green parts of tested plants (Cooper et al 1999;Lombi et al 2001;Zhen et al 2002). Laboratory studies showed that EDTA is more effective in removing Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd from contaminated soils, although extraction efficiency depends on many factors such as the lability of heavy metals in soil, the strength of EDTA, electrolytes, pH, and soil matrix (Brown and Elliot 1992;Heil et al 1999;Coscione et al 2009 Much of the previous work on chelate-assisted soil washing and phytoextraction was focused on Pb. In this study, natural and chemically enhanced phytoextractions of Pb and Cd were compared by growing spinach and mustard plants on two soils contaminated with multiple metals that were treated with varying rates of EDTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, soil is amended with certain chemicals, such as synthetic organic chelates {DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), CDTA (trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N ,N -tetraacetic acid), EGTA (ethylene glycol-[-aminoethyl ether]-N,N,N_,N_-tetra-acetic acid), EDDHA (ethylenediamine-di(o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid), NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid), HEDTA (hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid), EDDS (ethylenediamine-disuccinic acid), citric acid, and elemental sulfur (S)}, to increase the heavy-metal bioavailability in soil and thus enhance phytoextraction by plant and translocation of heavy metals from the roots to the green parts of tested plants (Cooper et al 1999;Lombi et al 2001;Zhen et al 2002). Laboratory studies showed that EDTA is more effective in removing Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd from contaminated soils, although extraction efficiency depends on many factors such as the lability of heavy metals in soil, the strength of EDTA, electrolytes, pH, and soil matrix (Brown and Elliot 1992;Heil et al 1999;Coscione et al 2009 Much of the previous work on chelate-assisted soil washing and phytoextraction was focused on Pb. In this study, natural and chemically enhanced phytoextractions of Pb and Cd were compared by growing spinach and mustard plants on two soils contaminated with multiple metals that were treated with varying rates of EDTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiency of these chelates mainly depends on the metal that is to be extracted and on the soil characteristics. In the case of copper, numerous studies show an advantage for biodegradable chelates over traditional synthetic ones (Gre ˇman et al, 2003;Luo et al, 2004;Tandy et al, 2004;Cao et al, 2007;Cosciones et al, 2009). In terms of environmental risk, studies by Cao et al (2007) and Gre ˇman et al (2003) have shown that the concentration of metals is significantly higher in the leachate from soils treated with the traditional chelate EDTA, than from soils treated with the biodegradable chelates MGDA or EDDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this prodecure, the concentration of the element in each soil fraction is measured. Further, it is possible to correlate the content in each fraction with the bioavailable contents to plants [6]. Several extractors are used to evaluate the metals' availability in soils, more frequently DTPA pH 7.3 [7], Mehlich-III [8] and 0.1 M HCl [9], but few studies were carried out to assess the efficacy of such extractors for Cu in soils from the humid tropic [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%