2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162008000500003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop area estimate from original and simulated spatial resolution data and landscape metrics

Abstract: Images acquired at the same day by the ETM+/Landsat-7 (30 m of spatial resolution) and MODIS/Terra (250 m) sensors were used to estimate areas of three major crops (soybean, sugarcane, and corn) with different landscape patterns in Southeastern Brazil. Majority filtering of ETM + classification results was applied to describe the behavior of 15 selected landscape metrics at distinct simulated spatial resolutions (90, 150, 210 and 270 m). By using regression models, the performance of MODIS and derived metrics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confusion can be explained by the pixel aggregation effect in spatial resolutions of 250 m, as described by Soares et al (2008). In fact, these authors, when working with sensors of different spatial resolutions, found that pixels from more fragmented classes, characterized by small polygons, were aggregated by less fragmented classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confusion can be explained by the pixel aggregation effect in spatial resolutions of 250 m, as described by Soares et al (2008). In fact, these authors, when working with sensors of different spatial resolutions, found that pixels from more fragmented classes, characterized by small polygons, were aggregated by less fragmented classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works, carried out with the TM-Landsat and the CCD-CBERS sensors, with a spatial resolution of approximately 30 and 20 m respectively, showed that these sensors are appropriate for the quantifi cation of crop areas from the point of view of its spatial resolution (Chen, 1990;Sanches, 2004;Soares et al, 2008). However, the temporal resolution of such satellites, which ranges around 16 days or more, is still a problem in the operational use of this kind of data for crop forecasting, given the high probability of cloud cover along the summer season (Ippoliti-Ramilo, 1999), especially in non-irrigated crops at tropical regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the continental dimension and the intense agricultural involvement of Brazil, information acquired from remote sensing images are important to various agricultural applications, such as crop monitoring, mapping and estimation of crop production (Galvão et al, 2009;Rizzi and Rudorff, 2007;Rudorff et al, 2010;Soares et al, 2008;Xavier et al, 2006). However, the availability of cloud free images during the primary growth period of summer crops is limited, particularly in tropical regions and, therefore, restricting the use of optical remote sensing imagery to monitor agricultural activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As São Paulo's forest cover is constituted mainly by very small patches(Ribeiro et al 2009), larger municipalities possibly have more isolated patches which may not be quantified by SOS, decreasing the difference between SOS and IBGE.EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONFIGURATION ON DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IF'S AND SOS'S FOREST COVER ESTIMATESOur results indicate that discrepancies between forest cover estimates from different spatial resolution images are influenced by different landscape structure characteristics.High total forest area (CA) in the municipality is related to higher differences between IF and SOS, indicating that SOS may be underestimating the forest cover in municipalities with more remnants. Forest cover in most São Paulo's municipalities are highly fragmented and composed of very small patches(Ribeiro et al 2009) which can be underestimated by coarser spatial resolution maps(Soares et al 2008), such SOS maps. For the same reason, large Permanent Protection Areas (PPA), resulting in more linear patches along rivers (high SHAPE values) and longer edges (high total edge length) increase the differences between IF and SOS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%