2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162004000400015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulk density and relationship air/water of horticultural substrate

Abstract: Change on substrate bulk density during the growing period may negatively affect other substrate physical properties and, consequently, plant growth. The objectives of this research were 1) to characterize physical properties of two horticultural substrates (S 1 and S 2 ), 2) to evaluate the effect of different bulk densities values of those substrates on their air/water relationship, and 3) to develop mathematical functions to estimate the air/water relationship by increasing substrates bulk density value. Fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, there is a reduction on the size of porous created by them. Fernandes et al (2004), suggested that in vegetables cropping the substrates with total porosity higher than 85% of the volume provides a good performance for yield production in pots. Available water (AW) and readily available water (RAW) were lower in the new substrate.…”
Section: Physical Analysis Of Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, there is a reduction on the size of porous created by them. Fernandes et al (2004), suggested that in vegetables cropping the substrates with total porosity higher than 85% of the volume provides a good performance for yield production in pots. Available water (AW) and readily available water (RAW) were lower in the new substrate.…”
Section: Physical Analysis Of Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of porosity and the increase of density in the reused substrates tend to higher water retention (Fernandes, 2006). A good substrate shall have, among other characteristics, 10 to 30% of aeration space and a readily available water range from 20 to 30% (Fernandes et al, 2004, Fernandes et al, 2007. Fernandes (2007) evaluated the reuse of seven substrates (blend of sand base materials, peanut shell and sugarcane bagasse), in cherry tomato (Sindy) crop and verified alteration of physical properties only in the treatment that simultaneously utilized the combination of some of them.…”
Section: Physical Analysis Of Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the assayed substrates can be considered light as their Db lay within the AR (< 400 kg m -3 ) and all complied with the recommended minimum porosity of 85 %, with the exception of BCH-FW-50 % which, nonetheless, was close to this limit. The water contents and particularly the air contents of growth media are of paramount importance to containerized plant production (Fernandes and Corá, 2004). In our case, HYD-FW is a material which strongly limits aeration of the substrate (8 % Vair in the pure material; data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Adequate measurements of apparent density are essential to calculate and understand other important substrate attributes for plant growth as total porosity, aeration space and available water (FERNANDES and CORÁ, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%