2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782014000400022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caracterização zoométrica de novilhas remanescentes da raça Pantaneira

Abstract: RESUMO Esse trabalho apresenta valores médios, erros padrão e correlações de Pearson de 10 medidas lineares (alturas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphological indices used in this study were able to characterize the phenotypic and production potential of M N lambs using the T PRI , A I , B CI "1" and B CI "2" variables, enabling the classification of breeding groups in high thoracic development, ability to produce meat, weight gain, feeding efficiency and breathing capacity, infusing greater breed rusticity and adaptability for both genetic groups (CONTRERAS et al, 2011;RAMOS, I. O. et al, 2019;SILVA-JARQUIN et al, 2019). These characteristics are in agreement with other studies which evaluated adaptability and productive potential of the M N breed, especially the red variety which has greater potential for meat production (LEITE et al, 2020;MELO et al, 2018;REZENDE et al, 2014), in addition to breaking The superiority observed in some morphometric and productive characteristics in crossbred lambs are justified by the fact that this crossbreed brought together intrinsic characteristics of the white group, meaning that we still observe the result of the heterosis process and complementarity of characteristics between genetic groups, even within the same breed. This is mainly because the M NW breed is larger when compared to the M NR (NUNES et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The morphological indices used in this study were able to characterize the phenotypic and production potential of M N lambs using the T PRI , A I , B CI "1" and B CI "2" variables, enabling the classification of breeding groups in high thoracic development, ability to produce meat, weight gain, feeding efficiency and breathing capacity, infusing greater breed rusticity and adaptability for both genetic groups (CONTRERAS et al, 2011;RAMOS, I. O. et al, 2019;SILVA-JARQUIN et al, 2019). These characteristics are in agreement with other studies which evaluated adaptability and productive potential of the M N breed, especially the red variety which has greater potential for meat production (LEITE et al, 2020;MELO et al, 2018;REZENDE et al, 2014), in addition to breaking The superiority observed in some morphometric and productive characteristics in crossbred lambs are justified by the fact that this crossbreed brought together intrinsic characteristics of the white group, meaning that we still observe the result of the heterosis process and complementarity of characteristics between genetic groups, even within the same breed. This is mainly because the M NW breed is larger when compared to the M NR (NUNES et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Morphometry was measured in the last week prior to slaughtering the animals with a tape measure and a biometric rod adapted according to (ARAÚJO, et al, 2014;BIANCHINI et al, 2006;REZENDE et al, 2014). The lambs were kept in the correct upright position on a horizontal concrete floor without slope during the measurements.…”
Section: Measurements and Morphometric Indices In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements were combined to calculate the following indexes for conformity, production suitability (milk and meat), and ethnology (Marchiani Dubuc, 1991;Contreras et al, 2011;Rezende et al, 2014a): anamorphic index (thoracic perimeter squared divided by withers height, multiplied by 100); pelvic index (rump width divided by rump length, multiplied by 100); withers-to-rump ratio (withers height divided by rump height); body index (body length divided by thoracic perimeter); lateral-body index (withers height divided by body length, multiplied by 100); relative body index (body length multiplied by 100, divided by withers height); body capacity index 1 (quotient between weight and body length); body capacity index 2 (quotient between weight and thoracic perimeter); transversal pelvic index (rump width divided by wither height, multiplied by 100); longitudinal pelvic index (rump length divided by withers height, multiplied by 100); and thoracicperimeter-to-withers ratio (thoracic perimeter divided by withers height).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the evaluation of the pelvic area of buffalo cows can contribute to identify animals with not as many delivery problems. Another tool for phenotypic evaluation can be the combined use of body measurements to develop zootechnical indexes, which has been reported as an efficient strategy to investigate the suitability of domestic animals (Cerqueira et al, 2011;Contreras et al, 2011;Meneses et al, 2013;Rezende et al, 2014aRezende et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain body measurements are limited by the physiological maturity of the animal (Sakamoto et al, 2014), in which measurements such as body length and croup height are directly related to, and limited by, the development of bone tissue, while thoracic girth, foreleg circumference, and body weight are mainly related to the development of muscle and adipose tissue, and follow their variation curves (Lee & Kim, 2010). As such, high, positively correlated responses between thoracic girth and body weight are to be expected (Rezende et al, 2014).…”
Section: Bullmentioning
confidence: 99%