2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782013001000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboração e validação de escalas diagramáticas para avaliação da severidade da mancha-bacteriana do feijão - caupi em cultivares com trifólios morfologicamente distintos

Abstract: Duas escalas diagramáticas foram desenvolvidas para quantificar a severidade da mancha-bacteriana do feijão-caupi, causada pela bactéria Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vignicola, em cultivares de feijão-caupi de trifólios com folíolos ovais e lanceolados. Trifólios com diferentes níveis de severidade foram coletados para determinação do limite mínimo e máximo de severidade, sendo níveis intermediários determinados de acordo com a "Lei do Estímulo de Weber-Fechner". Os níveis propostos foram: 0,05; 0,25; 1,00; 3,40… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the scale five evaluators were outside the range of -10 to 10, two of them (15.38% of the total evaluators) with errors between 15 and 20%, similar results were found in previous studies (SANTOS et al, 2017;TROJAN et al, 2018;LORENZETTI et al, 2019). Therefore, eight evaluators can be considered good in the assessment of the disease when using the scale (LIMA et al, 2013;NUÑEZ et al, 2017). These results showed a decrease of absolute errors, indicating high precision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the scale five evaluators were outside the range of -10 to 10, two of them (15.38% of the total evaluators) with errors between 15 and 20%, similar results were found in previous studies (SANTOS et al, 2017;TROJAN et al, 2018;LORENZETTI et al, 2019). Therefore, eight evaluators can be considered good in the assessment of the disease when using the scale (LIMA et al, 2013;NUÑEZ et al, 2017). These results showed a decrease of absolute errors, indicating high precision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Regarding the t-test for the values of the intercept (a), the null hypothesis was rejected in more cases when the scale was not used, with the scale accepted values increased in a 20%. R 2 values improved when the scale was used, the R 2 average showed an increase of 3.16% compared with the value obtained without the scale, in both cases the evaluation of severity showed good precision, the values of R 2 were ≥0.85, considered high for this type of estimate (LIMA et al, 2013;TROJAN et al, 2018;LORENZETTI et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The high severity levels reported in this study are commonly observed in yellow passion fruit orchards due to the difficult control of this disease and the susceptibility of commercial cultivars to this bacterium (ISHIDA; HALFELD-VIEIRA, 2009). To better represent the severity values identified for the bacterial spot, the SADs composed of a larger number of diagrams are frequently used in pathosystems that involve the species Xanthomonas (NASCIMENTO et al, 2005;LIMA et al, 2013;DUAN et al, 2015), as established in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the severity levels observed, a black and white 8diagram SADs (2; 4; 9; 18; 35; 58; 80; and 94%) was proposed (Figure 1). The number of diagrams used to represent the extent of the disease severity was similar to the number used in SADs proposed for other pathosystems involving different Xanthomonas species (BELASQUE JR. et al, 2005;NASCIMENTO et al, 2005;LIMA et al, 2013). Accuracy is defined as the exactness of a systematic error-free measure and is measured by the intercept and slope coefficient of a linear regression between actual severity and estimated severity (BERGAMIN FILHO;AMORIM, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%