2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782009005000067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise tridimensional de esforços em elementos rompedores de semeadoras de plantio direto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The double-disc showed a shallower working depth, as reported by Palma et al (2010) considering that they are bigger, and it is more difficult for them to penetrate the soil, as stressed by Seidi (2012). Similar results were also found by Koakoski et al (2007) and Mion et al (2009); according to the authors, such results are related to the fact that the hoe furrow opener reaches a greater depth due to the action of the tip, which causes a downward vector that tends to suck down the tip of the hoe.…”
Section: Maximum Furrow Depthsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The double-disc showed a shallower working depth, as reported by Palma et al (2010) considering that they are bigger, and it is more difficult for them to penetrate the soil, as stressed by Seidi (2012). Similar results were also found by Koakoski et al (2007) and Mion et al (2009); according to the authors, such results are related to the fact that the hoe furrow opener reaches a greater depth due to the action of the tip, which causes a downward vector that tends to suck down the tip of the hoe.…”
Section: Maximum Furrow Depthsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Mion et al (2009) corroborated this statement, since they found significant differences in soil disturbance by these mechanisms, with 0.0015 m² values for 3 Disturbance of Ultisol soil based on interactions between furrow openers and coulters between the rotary planes of the discs, and 70 mm height for the point of contact. By adjusting the tool holder, the working depth was 0.12 m for the hoe opener and 0.07 m for the double-discs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to these authors, these results may be due to the fact that there is no additional load on the equipment to increase its penetration in the soil. In this regard, Mion and Benez (2008), evaluating the efforts of five furrow opening mechanisms (even discs, corrugated discs, undulated discs, double discs, and shanks) with variation in vertical load, found that the shank promotes greater soil mobilization with less horizontal effort, reaching higher work depths because only the tip of the shank promotes resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the discs, according to the Mion and Benez (2008), more power is needed for them to penetrate, cut through soil and straw, and overcome rolling resistance and friction on the sides of the discs. These authors found that the wave disc showed the greatest lateral force values in relation to other mechanisms for vertical loads of 1500, 2250, and 3000 N. Considering the average of all vertical loads in absolute numbers, the soil area mobilized by the corrugated disc was second only to the shank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%