2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782009000600030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological counting in lamb carcasses from an abattoir in São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract: The consumption of lamb meat in Brazil has increased in the last years but little information about the microbiological quality of this product is available. To evaluate the hygienic-sanitary conditions of lamb carcasses, the quantification of microorganism populations indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Antoniollo et al (2003) found the pathogen in 4.3% of samples from carcasses slaughtered in Pelotas, Brazil. Martineli et al (2009 ) and Sierra et al (1997 ) did not detect L. monocytogenes in their studies in São Paulo, Brazil, and Dublin, Ireland, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, Antoniollo et al (2003) found the pathogen in 4.3% of samples from carcasses slaughtered in Pelotas, Brazil. Martineli et al (2009 ) and Sierra et al (1997 ) did not detect L. monocytogenes in their studies in São Paulo, Brazil, and Dublin, Ireland, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Animals subjected to pre-slaughter stress during transportation and/or lairaige produce meat of higher pH (>5.70) that translates into better conditions for microbial growth. Furthermore, immediately after slaughtering, when the muscle tissue is exposed, it may be contaminated by deteriorative bacteria from the hide's normal microbiota (staphylococci, micrococci, pseudomonads, molds and yeasts) as well as from faecal origin bacteria (Martineli et al, 2009). Hooves, hide, hair, fleece and guts are considered the most important sources of microbial contamination on flayed carcasses (Bell and Hathway, 1996), but there are potential sources of contamination such as equipments, utensils and operators (Sierra et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, bacterial counts in fresh lamb meat samples were in a range of 3 × 10 3 -1.5 × 10 5 CFU/g (Table 2). In another study, Martineli et al (2009) found that bacterial counts in lamb meat were in a range of 1.0 × 10 1 to 8.0 × 10 4 CFU/cm for mesophiles; 1.0 × 10 0 to 4.4 × 10 4 CFU/cm for psychrophiles (Martineli et al, 2009). Contamination of raw meat with bacteria can occur during slaughtering, cutting and inadequate storage conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%