Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] This may be due to different factors, such as pathogen prevalence in birds still on the poultry farm, weather conditions, animal transport, environmental conditions before slaughter, the slaughterhouse facilities, and the industrial processing of carcasses, besides the analytical methodology used. 16,20,21 Slaughtering logistics may also contribute to the difference in the number of positive carcasses. When carcasses that resulted positive are processed before negative ones or before those with low pathogen counts, cross-contamination may lead to a higher number of contaminated carcasses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] This may be due to different factors, such as pathogen prevalence in birds still on the poultry farm, weather conditions, animal transport, environmental conditions before slaughter, the slaughterhouse facilities, and the industrial processing of carcasses, besides the analytical methodology used. 16,20,21 Slaughtering logistics may also contribute to the difference in the number of positive carcasses. When carcasses that resulted positive are processed before negative ones or before those with low pathogen counts, cross-contamination may lead to a higher number of contaminated carcasses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the carcasses of broilers raised in Goiás, of which 19.8% were contaminated. Carvalho and Cortez (2005) isolated Salmonella sp. in 16.67% of cold carcasses from an abattoir in São Paulo.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…em carcaças de frango resfriadas e congeladas, com resultados que variam de 12 até 59% de positividade (FUZIHARA; FERNADES; FRANCO, 2000;CARVALHO;CORTEZ, 2005;REITER et al, 2007;CHEN et al, 2010;BORSOI et al, 2010). Assim, apesar da ausência do patógeno nas amostras analisadas, a variação dos resultados entre outros estudos, bem como, o risco à saúde dos consumidores associado à presença desse micro-organismo, torna relevante o contínuo monitoramento.…”
Section: Micro-organismosunclassified