1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84781999000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cianamida hidrogenada no raleio químico de flores e frutos de pessegueiros (Prunus persica, L. Batsch) cv. Eldorado

Abstract: O trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito da cianamida hidrogenada (CH2N2) no raleio de flores e frutos de pessegueiros do cultivar Eldorado. Utilizaram-se plantas com idade de 6 anos, conduzidas sob a forma de vaso e espaçamento de 6,0 x 4,0m, localizadas no Centro Agropecuário da Palma - UFPel. Os tratamentos (0; 0,15; 0,3; 0,45 e 0,6% de CH2N2) foram pulverizados em cobertura sobre ramos selecionados aleatoriamente, até o início de gotejamento, quando 100% das flores encontravam-se totalme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatments with fruit index similar to that of manual thinning (12.8%) were 0.6 and 0.8% CH 2 N 2 application at 50% fl owering and 0.4% CH 2 N 2 application at 100% fl owering, with percentages of 15.2, 13.4 and 10.9%, respectively ( Figure 1B). FALLAHI et al (1998) andRODRIGUES et al (1999) reported that increasing the CH 2 N 2 concentration increases fl ower thinning and decreases the fruit index, and our fi ndings are in line with those previously reported. A lower fruit index at 0.6 and 0.8% CH 2 N 2 application at 100% fl owering is a result of the high dose when a large number of fl owers are open and perhaps thinned by the chemical.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Treatments with fruit index similar to that of manual thinning (12.8%) were 0.6 and 0.8% CH 2 N 2 application at 50% fl owering and 0.4% CH 2 N 2 application at 100% fl owering, with percentages of 15.2, 13.4 and 10.9%, respectively ( Figure 1B). FALLAHI et al (1998) andRODRIGUES et al (1999) reported that increasing the CH 2 N 2 concentration increases fl ower thinning and decreases the fruit index, and our fi ndings are in line with those previously reported. A lower fruit index at 0.6 and 0.8% CH 2 N 2 application at 100% fl owering is a result of the high dose when a large number of fl owers are open and perhaps thinned by the chemical.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In studies using CH 2 N 2 for peach fl ower thinning, the mean fruit mass also increased with the CH 2 N 2 concentration, confi rming that the increase in CH 2 N 2 dose resulted in a stronger thinning effect, lower production, and larger fruits (MARODIN et al, 1994;FALLAHI, 1997;RODRIGUES et al, 1999;COUTINHO, 2001). The lower number of fruits in the plant enables production of fruits with a higher mean mass due to the increased availability and allocation of nutrients to each fruiting organ (GIOVANAZ et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gabardo et al (2017) also observed that soluble solid contents of apples are affected by the use of metamitron in plant thinning and by the period of application. Other studies using chemical thinners in peach trees did not find alteration of total soluble solids, pulp firmness and color index of 'Eldorado' peach fruits (Rodrigues et al, 1999). Results do not enable to establish a direct relation with periods of metamitron application because of the crop conditions.…”
Section: Soluble Solidmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…There was no difference between the epidermis color of fruits thinned by metamitron and the one of fruits which were manually thinned. Likewise, other studies of chemical thinning agents in peach trees did not find any changes in fruit color (Rodrigues et al, 1999). Changes in peach color are directly related to the genotype (Mayer et al, 2008), fruit ripening stage (Mathias et al, 2008), green pruning management (Gonçalves et al, 2014), amount of plant available water and the relation between fruits and sunlight (Alcobendas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Colorimetry Of the Peelmentioning
confidence: 84%