“…The review identified the following evaluation approaches in the PAC and PAS: evaluability 27,28 , sustainability 29,30 , process 3,4,10,29,31,32,33,34,35 , and outcome 3,13,31,32,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 and the degrees of inference of adequacy 3,4,10,29,31,32,33,34,35,36,40,43,44,45 , plausibility 13,37,38,39,42,46 , or probability 41 , which varied according to the program and its nature, characteristics, and objectives. The evaluative approaches are consistent with what is predicted in the theoretical fr...…”