2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-507x2011000400008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepâncias clínico-patológicas em pacientes graves com difícil diagnóstico pre-mortem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11 13 This decline in postmortem examinations is potentially detrimental: in the current era of high-tech medicine, postmortem examinations still reveal diagnostic errors and change the COD in a significant number of patients. [14][15][16][17] Postmortem imaging with or without postmortem tissue sampling (PMS) could decrease the persistent trend of declining autopsy rates, possibly by an increased awareness for postmortem examinations. 18 Postmortem imaging has gained popularity over the past decade, and may provide a solution for accurate determination of COD despite declining postmortem examination rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 13 This decline in postmortem examinations is potentially detrimental: in the current era of high-tech medicine, postmortem examinations still reveal diagnostic errors and change the COD in a significant number of patients. [14][15][16][17] Postmortem imaging with or without postmortem tissue sampling (PMS) could decrease the persistent trend of declining autopsy rates, possibly by an increased awareness for postmortem examinations. 18 Postmortem imaging has gained popularity over the past decade, and may provide a solution for accurate determination of COD despite declining postmortem examination rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even in the era of advanced diagnostic methods, the percentage of major discrepancies between clinical and (traditional) autopsy diagnosis is as high as 50%. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Despite the need for a correct cause of death and the known discrepancies between the clinical cause of death and the cause of death according to the autopsy, the number of clinical autopsies is declining worldwide. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The reason for this decline is a combination of factors, such as the overconfidence in the diagnostic procedures, financial and religious reasons, fear of mutilation, workload issues and a fear of litigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos casos de óbitos para os quais não se consegue definir a causa mortis ou para aqueles ocorridos sem assistência, o médico patologista do Serviço de Verificação de Óbito (SVO) deve emitir a DO após a autópsia ser autorizada pelo responsável do falecido. [8][9][10] De acordo com as normas do Ministério da Saúde, é atribuição do SVO [...] promover ações que proporcionem, via autópsia, o esclarecimento da causa mortis de todos os óbitos, com ou sem assistência médica, sem elucidação diagnóstica, e em especial aqueles sob investigação epidemiológica. 11 Os procedimentos diagnósticos realizados pelo SVO são tomados como padrão-ouro.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…17 Apesar da contribuição histórica dos SVO, a literatura científica tem priorizado a análise da qualidade das autópsias ou o perfil dos óbitos atestados pelos serviços. [8][9][10]12 Considerando-se a inexistência de avaliações da estrutura e do processo de trabalho desenvolvido nos SVO do país, além da carência de análises sobre a contribuição potencial desses serviços para a melhoria das estatísticas vitais e da vigilância epidemiológica, o presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a implantação dos Serviços de Verificação de Óbito -SVO -de Pernambuco.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified