2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-49792012000300012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partidos de oposição nos estados: o ambiente da competição na arena eleitoral

Abstract: O artigo propõe uma operacionalização do conceito de oposição baseada nas posturas assumidas publicamente pelos partidos e testa sua aplicação em uma análise comparada da arena eleitoral entre quatro estados brasileiros. O ambiente da competição entre situação e oposição em Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, São Paulo e Rio Grande do Sul é analisado através de uma série de indicadores empíricos nas eleições de 2002 e 2006. A análise mostra grandes variações na competitividade das oposições, nas estratégias de coligação… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epstein (2009) identified four different patterns of competition between Brazilian states: fragmented, unstable competitive, stable competitive, and hegemonic. Factors such as the distinctiveness of the political history, traditions, and culture among the sub‐national units as well as the strategies adopted by the parties in search of votes, are pointed out to account for differences in the electoral competition inside the country (Epstein, 2009; Tarouco, 2012). Moreover, evidence shows that, despite the increasing number of small parties at the sub‐national level, they have slightly affected electoral volatility at the state level (Nascimento, Silva, et al, 2016; Nascimento, 2018).…”
Section: Party System Change In Multi‐level Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epstein (2009) identified four different patterns of competition between Brazilian states: fragmented, unstable competitive, stable competitive, and hegemonic. Factors such as the distinctiveness of the political history, traditions, and culture among the sub‐national units as well as the strategies adopted by the parties in search of votes, are pointed out to account for differences in the electoral competition inside the country (Epstein, 2009; Tarouco, 2012). Moreover, evidence shows that, despite the increasing number of small parties at the sub‐national level, they have slightly affected electoral volatility at the state level (Nascimento, Silva, et al, 2016; Nascimento, 2018).…”
Section: Party System Change In Multi‐level Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%