Para além da dicotomia entre trabalho decente e trabalho digno: reconhecimento e direitos humanos

Rosenfield, Cinara Lerrer; Pauli, Jandir

doi:10.1590/s0103-49792012000200009

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There exists a tension between the universal and particular nature of the decent work concept; “on the one hand, the existence of an absolute and universal value, inherent in all human beings anytime and anywhere; and, on the other hand, the particular nature” (Rosenfield and Pauli, 2012, p. 322). This tension is marked by several concepts of decent work that more concretely refer to cultural and historically determined social groups.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This tension is marked by several concepts of decent work that more concretely refer to cultural and historically determined social groups. Both are important and, in this sense, the authors propose that “the universal is not the starting point, but the end point” (Rosenfield and Pauli, 2012, p. 322), that is, both contextual elements and universal elements are extremely important for decent work.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rodgers (2002), Rosenfield and Pauli (2012), and Mattos (2015) defend the idea of decent work as dignified working, but question what definition of dignity the notion of decent work should rest on: universal or historically constructed as an open axiological category (Rosenfield and Pauli, 2012). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Discussing the Notion of Decent Work: Senses of Working for a Group of Brazilian Workers without College Education

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite recent stability and socioeconomic development, Brazil’s history is marked by social inequality, informality, precarious work, and psychosocial vulnerability, with little opportunity for decent and meaningful work, as recommended by the International Labour Office (ILO), for people in the country. Nevertheless, based on a social constructionist view, the hypothesis can be raised that there is no substantive definition of decent work, but rather a psychosocial one, constructed based on the discourse, narratives, and practices produced through the relational processes which grant sense and meaning to work. Therefore, the examination of narratives and discourses is an important methodological strategy to understand the socio-occupational reality of Brazil. Thus, this study aims to understand the senses attributed to working through content analysis of the narratives produced by a set of 20 urban workers and contrast them with the ILO definition of decent work, in an effort to analyze the relationships, similarities, and differences between an established collective social discourse and the interviewees’ singular narratives. The main results point out that the participants look for working with fair wages, social protection, safety, and personal development opportunities, as the ILO recommends. The main difference is that these characteristics do not derive from the State’s actions, as in the employment and formal qualification model, but come from informal sources, such as family and community relationship networks. The informal relationship networks produce job opportunities as well as social protection; qualification takes place through practical learning from more experienced colleagues; the opportunity to be able to keep working (employed or working informally) leads to success and safety; and the possibility to make choices and have control over one’s life translates into personal and occupational development. In conclusion, the participants searched for working according to the principles recommended by the ILO. Nevertheless, in contexts of vulnerability and with restricted support from the State, these principles are constructed in the community and not offered by the public power, which generates distinguished forms of decent work.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Discussing the Notion of Decent Work: Senses of Working for a Group of Brazilian Workers without College Education

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Essa é a apresentação do reconhecimento como princípio normativo, tornada popular no debate teórico social recente principalmente por Axel Honneth (2011). Essas duas formas do reconhecimento, combinadas de diferentes modos, têm sido apropriadas, traduzidas e reformuladas com diferentes ênfases no Brasil, resultando em trabalhos de grande interesse para a compreensão de movimentos sociais nacionais (Neves, 2007Paiva, 2018;Pinto 2008), das recentes transformações do mundo do trabalho (Maciel, 2017;Rosenfield, Mello & Corrêa, 2015;Rosenfield & Pauli, 2012) e da cidadania política no país (Silva, 2019, cap. 6;Sobottka, 2015).…”

Section: IIunclassified

Reconhecimento social e seu contrário no Brasil / Social recognition and its opposed in Brazil

Souza

2020

RBS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O artigo discute o uso que Roberto Schwarz e Maria Sylvia de Carvalho Franco fazem do conceito de reconhecimento. Desse modo, busca mostrar que reconhecimento é, ao mesmo tempo, um princípio normativo e revelador de uma subordinação a práticas arbitrárias nos textos de ambos sobre a sociedade brasileira. Assim, a ordem do favor e a rede de relações de dominação pessoal que Schwarz e Franco, respectivamente, descrevem podem ser vistas como formas derivadas da subordinação do reconhecimento às necessidades práticas das camadas dominantes. Com isso, ao identificar uma “dissonância vexatória” entre o que intenciona uma norma de reconhecimento recíproco e o que intencionam as práticas concretas de reconhecimento, Schwarz e Franco mostram ser possível denunciar criticamente a transformação de um princípio legítimo de organização da vida social em um mecanismo de reprodução de hierarquias.Palavras-chave: reconhecimento, favor, dominação pessoal.***This paper presents the concept of recognition, as used by Roberto Schwarz and Maria Sylvia de Carvalho Franco. It tries to show that recognition is, at once, both a normative principle and a concept that reveals how everyday practices were subordinated by arbitrariness in Brazil. Accordingly, the relations of favor and personal domination, which Schwarz and Franco respectively describe, could be taken as consequences of practical necessities of the dominant classes. So, in identifying a “shaming dissonance” between what the norm of recognition implies and what it becomes within Brazilian society, both authors are able to show that is possible to critically denounce the inversion of a legitimate principle of social life’s organization into a mechanism of reproduction of social hierarchies.Keywords: recognition, favor, personal domination.

show abstract

“…Entre as principais questões levantadas pela literatura que vem discutindo o conceito de trabalho decente estão: o trabalho decente deveria ser um conceito universal ou historicamente construída como categoria axiológica aberta (Rosenfield & Pauli, 2012)? O trabalho decente seria o ponto de partida ou ponto de chegada para as condições de trabalho (Rosenfield & Pauli, 2012)? O emprego deveria ser o modelo de trabalho decente (Ghai, 2002;Mattos, 2015)?…”

unclassified

Contribuições da psicologia para repensar o conceito de trabalho decente

Ribeiro¹

2020

RPOT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trabalho decente é uma concepção objetiva e universalizante baseada em fatores sociais e econômicos proposta pela Organização Internacional do Trabalho (OIT). Diante disso, objetivou-se repensar o conceito de trabalho decente a partir das relevantes contribuições da psicologia internacional e, concomitantemente, brasileira, entendida como um exemplo das experiências do trabalhar no Sul global. Para a respectiva tarefa, levantamos, sistematizamos e analisamos os estudos de trabalho decente a partir da psicologia já publicados através de bases de dados nacionais (Pepsic, Scielo, BVS-Psi, Banco de teses USP, IBICT e CAPES) e internacionais (Scopus, PsycINFO, Proquest e Redalyc), de forma exploratória, analítica e descritiva. Os principais resultados apontaram que trabalho decente é um tema incipiente de investigação na psicologia, e que a psicologia poderia contribuir com os estudos gerais da temática oferecendo uma visão psicossocial e contextualizada para o conceito, na qual sejam articuladas dimensões universais às dimensões singulares, inseridas em determinados contextos sociais e do trabalho. Palavras-chave: trabalho informal, condições de trabalho, organização do trabalho.

show abstract

Para além da dicotomia entre trabalho decente e trabalho digno: reconhecimento e direitos humanos

Cited by 9 publications

References 1 publication

Discussing the Notion of Decent Work: Senses of Working for a Group of Brazilian Workers without College Education

Discussing the Notion of Decent Work: Senses of Working for a Group of Brazilian Workers without College Education

Reconhecimento social e seu contrário no Brasil / Social recognition and its opposed in Brazil

Contribuições da psicologia para repensar o conceito de trabalho decente

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About