PRONAF dez anos depois: resultados e perspectivas para o desenvolvimento rural

Guanziroli, Carlos Enrique

doi:10.1590/s0103-20032007000200004

Cited by 84 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Prior to this period, the high costs and lack of credit were seen as the principal problems facing Brazilian farmers, and in particular, family-based operations (Guanziroli, 2007).…”

Section: Brazilian National Programme For the Strengthening Of Familymentioning

confidence: 99%

Public policy on the family farming sector in Brazil: Towards a model of sustainable agriculture

Silva¹,

Santâ€TMAna²,

Maia³

2018

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is based on a review of the literature that analyses the repercussions of the principal public policies established for the promotion of the family farming sector in Brazil. In this review, the processes that have contributed to the establishment of these policies are assessed critically, together with their mechanisms and the connections for the evaluation of their contributions to the promotion of sustainable production systems. The review was based on a wide range of sources, including books, journals, and other scientific papers, in particular those published by the principal authors in this field, in addition to the databases of Brazilian governmental institutions. The analysis focuses primarily on the National Program for Strengthening Family Farming (PRONAF), the baseline for all other policies, as well as the recently-established Technical Assistance and Rural Extension Policy (PNATER), and the government food purchasing programmes. Despite advances, a number of important limitations were found, in particular in relation to credit programmes and the Technical Assistance and Rural Extension, for the development of models of sustainable agriculture. Overall, many of the mechanisms found in the policies analyzed are oriented towards conventional production systems, which cause socioenvironmental impacts that contradict the goals of sustainable rural development.

show abstract

“…Prior to this period, the high costs and lack of credit were seen as the principal problems facing Brazilian farmers, and in particular, family-based operations (Guanziroli, 2007).…”

Section: Brazilian National Programme For the Strengthening Of Familymentioning

confidence: 99%

Public policy on the family farming sector in Brazil: Towards a model of sustainable agriculture

Silva¹,

Santâ€TMAna²,

Maia³

2018

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Políticas públicas como o PRONAF têm contribuído com a agricultura familiar, a parceira entre os agricultores e o programa favorece a geração de renda e melhora as condições da qualidade de vida no campo, além de auxiliar na diversificação da produção, abrir novos mercados, valorizar os produtos locais e fortalecer as organizações sociais (SANTOS, 2015;GUANZIROLI, 2007).…”

Section: Agricultura Familiarunclassified

Restaurantes Populares Em Toledo: Um Programa De Desenvolvimento

Zanini

Braun

2016

RE&D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recebido em 12 de janeiro de 2016. Aceito em 25 de fevereiro de 2016. RESUMOEste trabalho tem por objetivo principal analisar os restaurantes populares do município de Toledo e sua contribuição para o desenvolvimento regional. O projeto dos restaurantes populares é um grande avanço na construção de uma política de segurança alimentar mais sólida. Por meio do Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) do Governo Federal, os restaurantes populares possibilitam acesso à alimentação saudável com baixo custo à população, além de estimular e fortalecer a produção local de alimentos oriundos da agricultura familiar do município. Observou-se que atualmente Toledo possui o maior número de unidades do Estado e é um grande exemplo de sucesso no contexto nacional, servindo de motivação para outros países. Destacam-se neste contexto, as melhorias conquistadas com o projeto, como melhora na qualidade de vida do homem do campo, incentivo ao associativismo e cooperativismo, fortalecimento da feira local, redução dos índices de insegurança alimentar e nutricional queda nos gastos públicos com atendimento nas unidades de saúde, entre outros, evidenciando que essa política pública contribui para o desenvolvimento das regiões onde estão inseridos. Palavras-chave: Políticas Públicas; Restaurantes Populares; Agricultura Familiar. ABSTRACTThis study is meant to examine the popular restaurants in the city of Toledo and its contribution to regional development. The design of the popular restaurants is a major step forward in building a stronger food security policy. Through the Food Acquisition Program (PAA) of the Federal Government, the popular restaurants provide access to healthy food at low cost to the public, and encourage and strengthen the local production of food from the family of the county agriculture. It was observed that Toledo currently has the largest number of state units and is a great example of success at the national level, serving as motivation to other countries. It stands out in this respect the improvements achieved with the project, such as improved quality of life of the peasant, encouraging associations and cooperatives, strengthening the local market, lowering the levels of food insecurity and nutritional decline in public spending on care in health facilities, among others, showing that this public policy contributes to the development of the regions where they live.

show abstract

“…Isso porque antes da implementação do Pronaf, os produtores não obtinham subsídios do Governo Federal para financiar a sua produção, sendo a descapitalização um dos principais problemas enfrentados, ocasionando baixa produtividade. Diante de tal problemática, viu-se a necessidade de direcionar esforços para se auferir progressos significativos na agricultura familiar, de modo conseguir recursos necessários para com o alcance de uma produção mais rentável, com a interação entre governo, agricultor e agroindústria (GUANZIROLI, 2007).…”

unclassified