2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-17592009000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust control methodology for the design of supplementary damping controllers for FACTS devices

Abstract: In this paper, a new procedure to design Supplementary Damping Controllers (SDCs) for Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) devices is proposed. The control design problem is formulated as a search for a feasible controller subject to restrictions in the form of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs). The main objective, from the application viewpoint, is the improvement of the damping ratios associated to inter-area oscillation modes. Unlike other types of formulations existing in the literature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to emphasize that given the non-convex nature of the undepinning BMI, we cannot guarantee that the LMI problem that is created by setting the matrix Cc obtained from the solution of the state feedback problem will always have a solution. Recent papers, however have shown that this heuristics for calculation of matrix C c provides satisfactory results for the overall design procedure, as seen, for example, in (Ramos et al, 2004;Ramos et al, 2005;Kuiava et al, 2009).…”
Section: Solving the Bmi Problem: The Two-step Separation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is important to emphasize that given the non-convex nature of the undepinning BMI, we cannot guarantee that the LMI problem that is created by setting the matrix Cc obtained from the solution of the state feedback problem will always have a solution. Recent papers, however have shown that this heuristics for calculation of matrix C c provides satisfactory results for the overall design procedure, as seen, for example, in (Ramos et al, 2004;Ramos et al, 2005;Kuiava et al, 2009).…”
Section: Solving the Bmi Problem: The Two-step Separation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Its arrangement can either be combination of shunt and series controllers with effective coordinated control or unified power flow series and shunt controllers [16]. Series and Shunt part inject current and voltage respectively into the transmission network and can exchange power between these two controllers through the power link [29,30] used UPFC to simultaneously regulate power flow through transmission lines (overload and loop flow minimization) and also minimizes power losses without generators rescheduling. The UPFC consist of a STATCOM and a DVR (Direct Voltage Regulator), both sharing a common capacitor on their DC side and a unified control system.…”
Section: Combined Series-shunt Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These controllers are able to provide adequate damping for the oscillation modes of interest for several different operating conditions, in order to improve network stability [30]. Though installing FACTS controllers for the purpose of only stability improvement is not an economical practice (Table 4).…”
Section: Combined Series-shunt Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as shown in Reference [9], given that it is a common practice to set the power injected from the distributed generators to a constant value (regardless of the demanded load), it is reasonable to expect that the dynamics of the generators (and also the damping of electromechanical oscillations) will not be so significantly affected by changes in the operating conditions (which is evidently not true in generation/transmission systems, see for example the tests performed in Reference [28]). …”
Section: Overview Of the Electromechanical Oscillation Problem In Powmentioning
confidence: 99%