2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502006000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-abdominal pressure measurement during ultrasound assessment of women with stress urinary incontinence: a novel model

Abstract: There is no need to measure IAP routinely on perineal ultrasound assessments of the UVJ and PU in women with SUI having a barely empty bladder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in abdominal pressure do not appear to have influenced the findings of this study. Specifically, the straining that accompanies a VM likely produces similar pressure changes in the mouth and intra-abdominal regions (Madjar et al 2003;Brandt et al 2006), along with sympathetic activation (Smith et al 1996;Shoemaker et al 2003). However, the magnitude of change in spleen volume was similar between the VM and the LBNP protocols, despite differences in respiratory pattern and abdominal pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in abdominal pressure do not appear to have influenced the findings of this study. Specifically, the straining that accompanies a VM likely produces similar pressure changes in the mouth and intra-abdominal regions (Madjar et al 2003;Brandt et al 2006), along with sympathetic activation (Smith et al 1996;Shoemaker et al 2003). However, the magnitude of change in spleen volume was similar between the VM and the LBNP protocols, despite differences in respiratory pattern and abdominal pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IAP was calculated as the averaged contact pressure between the inner bladder wall and the urine. The IAP achieved at maximal Valsalva was assumed as 100 cm H 2 O, which is within the physiological range as SUI patients exhibited an IAP at maximum straining of 99.3 6 51.8 cm H 2 O (7-193 cm H 2 O) [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Przekładało się to na wzrost maksymalnego ciśnienia za- Niewątpliwym ograniczeniem badania jest fakt, że maksymalny nacisk na dno miednicy mniejszej przy próbie Valsalvy jest zmienny i zależny od wielu czynników, co utrudnia interpretację wyników. Jednak Brandt i inni, którzy w swym badaniu w trakcie parcia monitorowali ciśnienie w jamie brzusznej (intra-abdominal pressure -IAP) i obserwowali w USG zmiany w szyi pęcherza i bliższym fragmencie cewki moczowej, donoszą, że nie ma potrzeby monitorowania IAP u pacjentek z małą objętością moczu w pęcherzu, gdyż nie było zależności między maksymalną wartością IAP a badanymi w USG parametrami [14]. Na interpretację wyników może mieć wpływ również fakt, że ocena ultrasonograficzna po zabiegu dokonywana była we wczesnym okresie rekonwalescencji.…”
Section: Dyskusjaunclassified