The Post-Political Link Between Gender and Climate Change: The Case of the Nationally Determined Contributions Support Programme

Ruíz, Felipe; Vallejo, Juan Pablo

doi:10.1590/s0102-8529.2019410200005

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although gender inequality in agriculture and climate change was problematised, proposed local solutions remained very general and vague. This resonates with Ruiz and Vallejo's (2019) work in Colombia, where gender discourse was prominent but proposed gender policies, actions and strategies lacked content and specificity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Examining the promise of ‘the local’ for improving gender equality in agriculture and climate change adaptation

Acosta

Wessel

Bommel

et al. 2021

Third World Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Examining the promise of ‘the local’ for improving gender equality in agriculture and climate change adaptation

Acosta

Wessel

Bommel

et al. 2021

Third World Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This resonates with Ruiz and Vallejo's (2019) work in Colombia, where gender discourse was prominent but proposed gender policies, actions, and strategies lacked content and specificity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

‘Doing gender’: impacts of local meaning making on gender mainstreaming in agricultural and climate change policy in Uganda

Acosta¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chapter 2. The Power of Narratives: Explaining Inaction on Gender Mainstreaming in Uganda's Agricultural and Climate Change Policy 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Gender mainstreaming in climate change policy making 2.3 Conceptual framework -Narrative policy analysis 2.4 Methodology 2.5 Mapping the narrative landscape of gender and climate change adaptation in Uganda 2.6 Narrative shifts: mapping narratological power in action 2.7 Discussion and conclusion Chapter 3. Discursive Translations of Gender-Mainstreaming Norms: The Case of Agricultural and Climate Change Policies in Uganda 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The domestication of international norms 3.3 Methodology 3.4 Findings 3.5 Discussion 3.6 Concluding remarks Contents xii Chapter 4. What does it Mean to Make a "Joint" Decision? Unpacking Intrahousehold Decision Making in Agriculture: Implications for Policy and Practice 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Background 4.3 Examining "joint decision making" in research for development 4.4 Research methodology 4.5 Results 4.6 Discussion 4.7 Conclusions Chapter 5. The Promise of Localization: Examining the Potential of "The Local" for Improving Gender Equality in Agriculture and Climate Change 5.1 Introduction 5.2 The rise of "the local" in international development 5.3 Methodology 5.4 Results 5.5 Discussion and conclusion Chapter 6. General Discussion and Conclusion 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Main findings: conclusions from the empirical chapters 6.3 Main findings: discussion of crosscutting themes 6.4 Theoretical contributions to the politics of gender equality and interpretive policy analysis 6.5 Limitations and avenues for future research 6.6 Policy recommendations and implications for practice 6.7 Concluding remarks

show abstract

Gender in Climate Litigation in Latin America: Epistemic Justice Through a Feminist Lens

Gutiérrez¹

2023

Journal of Human Rights Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emerging strategic litigation in Latin America, in particular, and the Global South more broadly, brings visibility to marginalized groups and allows novel approaches to promote climate action. Rights-based claims have taken centre stage in Global South climate litigation, strengthening the links between human rights and the environment. However, the gendered impacts of the climate crisis are not broadly discussed within the climate litigation movement. This article focuses on how gender has impacted marginalized groups’ participation in knowledge production regarding climate change and litigation. This article draws on feminist epistemology theories to problematize epistemic injustices that fail to acknowledge socially situated knowledge of marginalized groups as relevant and vital. Knowledge production regarding climate change tends to reproduce power dynamics that exclude local and marginalized groups’ knowledge. It also recreates epistemic injustices through objectification and exploitation of the epistemic agent. Moreover, knowledge production in climate litigation fails to recognize marginalized groups’ agency. Drawing from the emerging body of climate cases in Latin America, this article assesses how gender is portrayed and understood by scholars, petitioners and judges working in the region and how this understanding, or the lack of it, impacts knowledge production and power dynamics that intersect with other forms of discrimination.

show abstract

The Post-Political Link Between Gender and Climate Change: The Case of the Nationally Determined Contributions Support Programme

Cited by 3 publications

References 16 publications

Examining the promise of ‘the local’ for improving gender equality in agriculture and climate change adaptation

Examining the promise of ‘the local’ for improving gender equality in agriculture and climate change adaptation

‘Doing gender’: impacts of local meaning making on gender mainstreaming in agricultural and climate change policy in Uganda

Gender in Climate Litigation in Latin America: Epistemic Justice Through a Feminist Lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About